
This guy is the last of three guys to go in trial for the kidnapping, murder and dismemberment of three people in Pittsfield Ma back in 2011. His lawyer is afraid his client's appearance may keep his client from receiving a fair trial because jurors will already have made up their minds he's guilty beforehand. Could you judge him based on solely the evidence and testimony or could you not judge him fairly based on his appearance. The local morning show asked the question and my reply was it's all about the evidence. It's his right to look like a horses ass. If the evidence shows he's guilty then he's a guilty douchebag who just happens to also look like a horses ass and will spend rest of his life looking that way in prison. What do you peeps think?
Comment