$74.7 Billion for war....

[TheDeacon]

I am waiting for the war is illegal comeback. That seems to be the stance that Got Gear? has taken. I think he also said Canada didn't support America because they were afraid of friendly fire. WTF is that about?

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by LadiesMan
The US gets the majority of its oil from veneuzela. France & other countries get most of their oil from IRAQ.

Possibly.. but Kuait is selling oil to the US for under market value. Maybe not the majority of the oil the US uses, but the majority of the oil that Kuait produces goes to the US.

BUT.. that's just what that media is telling me. I'll go do some research and see if I can find something in print.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by LadiesMan
The fact that he has chemical weapons of mass destruction is reason enough for us to do what we are doing, don't you agree?

If you do agree that he has them, then you do agree that he betrayed the UN, & you should realize that if he has all that to hide, then he was plotting terror on the US & the world. Shouldn't the that be enough reason to take him out?

Well, who said I'm not for "Taking him out"?

The problem is that your basing this on theory and not fact. (you don't know for sure what weapons he has)

While your theory is probably correct, you need the facts to prove it before you can justify action. "Innocent untill proven guilty" if you will.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
I am waiting for the war is illegal comeback. That seems to be the stance that Got Gear? has taken. I think he also said Canada didn't support America because they were afraid of friendly fire. WTF is that about?

Deacon. Seriously dude your pissing me off.

I've answered this on the original thread. Read it if you want my reply.

AND, I'll ask you again. Do you have anything intelligent to add to this or are you just in here to bust my chops?

[pudgy]

ding second fight round 1

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by LadiesMan
I want to know the level of education LOCO & Got Gear have. Honestly?

Diploma in the Field of Electronics Engineering. So no, I have no more insite into this than your typical Joe.

[Keiser]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
Well, who said I'm not for "Taking him out"?

The problem is that your basing this on theory and not fact. (you don't know for sure what weapons he has)

While your theory is probably correct, you need the facts to prove it before you can justify action. "Innocent untill proven guilty" if you will.

I think Mr. Bush has the facts, he knows. If he told the public what saddam actually had, people would panic. Basically you and I are just peons, we don't know the facts, that is why the concepts of supporting your president and leaders exists, they know what is best and that is what they are doing. The truth will come out later, until then, i will support the leader of my country.

I hope you change your attitude once the facts come to the surface. If saddam uses chemicals and you STILL are against the war, then you have some issues bro. Please don't be too proud & biased to change your stance & I will do the same.

[Keiser]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
Diploma in the Field of Electronics Engineering. So no, I have no more insite into this than your typical Joe.

OK, I am an engineer as well (software), so I am not political science major either, but Mr. Bush the leaders of this country have the proper education & training.

[Keiser]

Most of the anti-war people fit in one of these categories:

1. Not from the US (Canada, Frace, etc.... countries that want peace because the aren't strong enough to defend themselves if all hell breaks loose)
2. Uneducated (notice the people from hollywood)
3. Gay men (same as #1, they are scared & aren't strong enought to defend themselves)
4. Ugly women (not sure about this one, but take a look at some of these hideous looking creatures during the protests, I think it has something to do with the tree-hugger types)

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by LadiesMan
I think Mr. Bush has the facts, he knows. If he told the public what saddam actually had, people would panic. Basically you and I are just peons, we don't know the facts, that is why the concepts of supporting your president and leaders exists, they know what is best and that is what they are doing. The truth will come out later, until then, i will support the leader of my country.

I hope you change your attitude once the facts come to the surface. If saddam uses chemicals and you STILL are against the war, then you have some issues bro. Please don't be too proud & biased to change your stance & I will do the same.

I think you're a little confused about my attitude towards this war.

I'm mostly torn in 2 directions. I think Saddam has these weapons and this war is overdue, but the "Innocent untill proven guilty" thing also haunts me. Now that the war has already started, you won't see me protesting to stop it. Might as well finish the job.

I also think your wrong about Bush not telling his people if he had proof of WMD. Think of the cuban missle crisis.. they told the people then and it was a hellovalot scarrier! Also Bush is already claiming that Saddam has WMD and is baseing alot of his war campain around it. Proof is exactly what Bush needs to get the support of all the US people as well as the UN, and prove that he was right all along.

[Keiser]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
I think you're a little confused about my attitude towards this war.

I'm mostly torn in 2 directions. I think Saddam has these weapons and this war is overdue, but the "Innocent untill proven guilty" thing also haunts me. Now that the war has already started, you won't see me protesting to stop it. Might as well finish the job.

I also think your wrong about Bush not telling his people if he had proof of WMD. Think of the cuban missle crisis.. they told the people then and it was a hellovalot scarrier! Also Bush is already claiming that Saddam has WMD and is baseing alot of his war campain around it. Proof is exactly what Bush needs to get the support of all the US people as well as the UN, and prove that he was right all along.

You could be right about that, but like I said, us peons don't know for sure, but we will find out hopefully in time.

[Keiser]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
I think you're a little confused about my attitude towards this war.

That is why we are debating

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by LadiesMan
Most of the anti-war people fit in one of these categories:

1. Not from the US (Canada, Frace, etc.... countries that want peace because the aren't strong enough to defend themselves if all hell breaks loose)
2. Uneducated (notice the people from hollywood)
3. Gay men (same as #1, they are scared & aren't strong enought to defend themselves)
4. Ugly women (not sure about this one, but take a look at some of these hideous looking creatures during the protests, I think it has something to do with the tree-hugger types)

Ladiesman.. sheesh. Sometimes I wonder if you really think about some of the stuff you post.

Do you honestly think Canada has to worry about an Iraqi attack?

You post is also derogatory to gay people as well as those of us unlucky enough to be overweight. I suggest you remove it. It's childish and you should know it.

[Keiser]

Where did I say anything about anyone being overweight in this thread?

[Keiser]

Am I wrong for saying hollywood people are uneducated? No, its a fact, just like the rest, i'm not being childish.