ok i give, im gonna ask a war question

[TheDeacon]

SO what you are saying is that a country needs 10 be 100 % right to earn a vote. How about 85 % would that work?

BTW, Al Qaeda attacked NYC and they have links to Saddam. No sense in arguing. You have not provided any facts, just pro-Canada anti-american BS.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
BTW this is what you said.

I'm well aware of what I typed thanks.

Here's an article on Canadian war casualties in Afghanistan.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/WarOnTerrorism/2003/01/01/8828-cp.html

Americans 4, terrorists 0 (at least as of Jan this year).

America has the honor of killing the first Canadian troops since the Korean war.

P.S. I realize that this was a mistake and an accident. But it's also a fact no matter how it's rationalized.

EDIT: Awe fawk, that link is wrong. UGH! Forget it, do your own ground work if you want the info.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
SO what you are saying is that a country needs 10 be 100 % right to earn a vote. How about 85 % would that work?

BTW, Al Qaeda attacked NYC and they have links to Saddam. No sense in arguing. You have not provided any facts, just pro-Canada anti-american BS.

Listen here! Learn to be civil or get the fuck out. I have no need to deal with your childish behavior.

Point out my anti-american BS.

What facts have you asked for? You asked for proof of my stated facts, which have since been supplied.

You've got to learn to stick to the point of what you're argueing here bro. I have no idea why you're jumping all over me here about the legitimacy of the US attack. All I said is that Friendly fire is probably one of the reasons Canada is unwilling to participate in a war that at this point is illegal according to international law. I never said the US isn't in the right.

[TheDeacon]

So I guess our mistakes are held against us. Canada is sitting back watching US soldiers die so that to me is just as bad.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
So I guess our mistakes are held against us. Canada is sitting back watching US soldiers die so that to me is just as bad.

Damn skippy! Look here.. you do something and you get burnt. Any rational person thinks twice before doing it again.

We wouldn't have to sit back and watch if you'd have managed to get UN approval. Regardless, just because the US is breaking international law (the same laws the US claims to try so hard to uphold) you can't expect Canada to do the same.

Plus I resent the statement that we're just "sitting back and watching". We both know that there's more than that going on..

[pudgy]

ding round 3

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by blm9376
The bottom line is, you are speculating.

Didn't I make that clear from the beginning tho?
Nobody is going to know for sure unless you do some sort of an opinion poll.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by pudgy
ding round 3

**commentator**
And a wild punch catches the ref right on the chin!!

[pudgy]

ok, time for everyone to simmer down a little

[3Vandoo]

Al- Q as no links to Saddam!

NONE, what so ever!

please stop believing the BS, foxnews propaganded!

Since the last 15 years, AL-Q does operation against Saddam.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by blm9376
If you did I missed it in all the other childish banter. And a poll is still specualtion so that wouldn't clarify anything.

Lol.. then how would you figure it out? Ask Cretien? (I really gotta learn how to spell that name). All he knows is that the people don't support it.

Lol.. you lost it? Or you didn't read closely? I just re-read all my posts and they all say "I think" , "Maybe" or "probably".

[pudgy]

i think your all a bunch of opinonated homos

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by blm9376
and more speculation....Honestly bro, what concrete proof do you or any of us for that matter have to prove or disprove statements like this.

You're speculating that all Vandoo is saying is speculation. THere's no proof either way, and there can never be proof for Vandoo's claim.

You really need to put away the speculation card, It's worn out for today.

Nobody really knows, but I'm sidding with Vandoo. There's no proof of a link between Saddam and Al-Queda. We've heard of "funding links" but that link is very weak at the best of times.

[pudgy]

NOW DOES EVERYONE SEE WHY I DONT ASK WAR QUESTIONS.

BLM-YOU GOT BETTER WEATHER THAN ME SO SHUT UP
GG- YOU GOT BETTER FISHING THAN ME SO SHUT UP

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by pudgy
i think your all a bunch of opinonated homos

I need a pic of a can, some worms, and a can-opener.