ok i give, im gonna ask a war question

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by pudgy
count yourself lucky [/B]

And I do... Tho I have to admit that I don't think a terrorist strike against Canada is very likely at this point.

[3Vandoo]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
Yeah, Friendly fire does suck.

Maybe part of the reason there's no Canadian troops involved in this one?

No

Canada is there btw, the ground troops were reduced by half

[TheDeacon]

Can I ask who defines what is illegal and legal? Was flying planes into the WTCs illegal?

Countries don't have the right to define what another country has to do to protect its' security.

Also, can you find some articles on when the PM of Canada said friendly fire was the main reason for not helping out the US? Also any stats on Canadians killed by AMERICANS in Afghanistan would be helpful.

[3Vandoo]

a terrorist strike against canada unlikely

eeeeeeeeeewwwwww!!!!!

if you only knew, if you only knew...





watch out for the booby trapped poutine

[3Vandoo]

Originally posted by TheDeacon


Countries don't have the right to define what another country has to do to protect its' security.

Yes when they signed a paper saying they will follow it, a contract is a contract,

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
Can I ask who defines what is illegal and legal? Was flying planes into the WTCs illegal?

Countries don't have the right to define what another country has to do to protect its' security.

Also, can you find some articles on when the PM of Canada said friendly fire was the main reason for not helping out the US? Also any stats on Canadians killed by AMERICANS in Afghanistan would be helpful.

Whao whao.. don't be twisting my words all out of proportion here.

I said I believe it's a big reason, I never said it's the main reason. In fact, I'm sure it's not. And No, I don't have any quotes of Cretian saying why.

Also, what Vandoo has stated is correct. If you're part of the UN and you declare war on another country without the support of the UN, you're going against international law (the law you aggreed to uphold when you joined the UN).

International law = Laws agreed upon and enforced by the UN.

[pudgy]

EVERYBODY SHUT UP

[3Vandoo]

Originally posted by pudgy
EVERYBODY SHUT UP

ok

[pudgy]

wow that was cool

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by pudgy
EVERYBODY SHUT UP

Lol... typical old guy!

Starts a ruckas then complains about the noise!

[pudgy]

its past my bedtime...lol

[TheDeacon]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
Whao whao.. don't be twisting my words all out of proportion here.

I said I believe it's a big reason, I never said it's the main reason. In fact, I'm sure it's not. And No, I don't have any quotes of Cretian saying why.

Also, what Vandoo has stated is correct. If you're part of the UN and you declare war on another country without the support of the UN, you're going against international law (the law you aggreed to uphold when you joined the UN).

International law = Laws agreed upon and enforced by the UN.

I still would like to see stats of Canadians being killed by Americans in Afghanistan and the US has the right to defend itself after being attacked i.e. the World Trade Centers.

[TheDeacon]

Originally posted by Got Gear?
Canada isn't refusing to help. Just refusing to help illegally (without the support of the UN).

However, I think it is a big reason.
If memory serves me correctly, the only Canadian troops we have lost so far in Afghanastan have been from American Friendly fire.
Regardless, we've lost more of our men to Americans than to Terrorists.

BTW this is what you said.

[Got Gear?]

Originally posted by TheDeacon
I still would like to see stats of Canadians being killed by Americans in Afghanistan and the US has the right to defend itself after being attacked i.e. the World Trade Centers.

Lol....who attacked the WTC?

If America was 100% in the right, you would have UN approval..

[pudgy]

ding round 2