STIMULUS CHECK

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

Let me ask you, where did the money from the Stimulus Bush sent out come from? Who did it go too? Did it not go to the same American's you claim pay no taxes? It was ok then, no uproar then, why?

Let's see if you answer any of these...

Who said it was okay then?

[Fit2bLarge]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

There's obviously a double standard.

Stout, I never said it was ok. I was questioning why the conservatives wheren't up in arms when Bush did it. But now its an issue. Double standard. Then again, we shouldn't expect anything better.

[3sweeties]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

Who said it was okay then?

Exactly

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

There's obviously a double standard.

Stout, I never said it was ok. I was questioning why the conservatives wheren't up in arms when Bush did it. But now its an issue. Double standard. Then again, we shouldn't expect anything better.

There is no double standard that I can see. You think just because people are anti-bailout they must have thought it was okay when Bush was in office but I don't see that....where do you?

Honestly I don't think anyone thought it was okay but then again I can't speak for other people nor can you unless you can pull some direct quotes we're people here were for the bailouts....until you can do that you're putting words in people's mouths just because they may or may not be conservative or they may or may not have voted for Obama.

[Fit2bLarge]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

I can't speak for anyone else. I'm talking about what I see. You don't see a double standard, I do. We can agree to disagree.

And you prove my point : you don't see anything or anyone against the Bush checks when they were sent out. If the check was free money for those that don't pay taxes, where are the debates? Where are the discussions? Where is the uproar? If you're not against something, are you for it?

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

I can't speak for anyone else. I'm talking about what I see. You don't see a double standard, I do. We can agree to disagree.

And you prove my point : you don't see anything or anyone against the Bush checks when they were sent out. If the check was free money for those that don't pay taxes, where are the debates? Where are the discussions? Where is the uproar? If you're not against something, are you for it?

Where do you get your information that people were for the Bush bailouts but against Obama's (other than your own personal opinion)?

I'm looking for direct quotes or something other than YOUR opinion of what YOU see.

[Fit2bLarge]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

I have no direct quotes. There are no post. Nothing, zero, nada. No word or mention.

What I see is that no one spoke up about being against it. Can you find a post where someone was against or for it? I'm sure you'll find none. And again, that's the point. If you search for those opposed to the Obama stimulus package, there are many expression opinions.

what's good for the goose...

[FUZO]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

It wasnt a god damn issue back then when bush handed out the stimulis checks on this board or in the forum.you keep reaching and going way back with bush. its today its all of obamas bull shit ideas that wont work.yet you liberals keep thinking they will.he already put us deeper in red and will continue yet you liberals think he isnt going to raise taxes,yeah right

[BABY1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

Possibly you did not hear much about the Stimulus check when Bush passed it. Seeing that most of us agree that it did nothing then, so we believe Obama's will not work either.

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

I have no direct quotes. There are no post. Nothing, zero, nada. No word or mention.

What I see is that no one spoke up about being against it. Can you find a post where someone was against or for it? I'm sure you'll find none. And again, that's the point. If you search for those opposed to the Obama stimulus package, there are many expression opinions.

what's good for the goose...

So basically what you're saying is that since you can't find it then you MUST be right? Just because you can't read/find it doesn't mean it gives any validity towards OR against your statement.

I'm sure the Political Forum gets pruned so there isn't so many threads in here as this is a fitness board

Before you go sticking words in people's mouths maybe you should ask them before making ASSumptions. Everything isn't so "black and white" as you want to make it to be.

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

If you had been around the last few months MAYBE you would have a better understanding of where people's views are, but you're just trying to categorize and lump everyone that isn't worshiping the ground Obama walks on because he is the first president that isn't 100% white. I do appluad the guy for overcoming that obstacle but it was that obstacle ALONE that got him elected. He really has no credentials or background in politics. That's a fact, it can't be argued.

Funny thing is that if Obama was white he would NOT have been elected. Obama got elected SOLEY on the fact that he is black. He has NO credentials to be president nor has he ever even done anything in the Senate. I'm not saying there is anythign he has done that is bad, but he hasn't proven himself to be leader or someone that even introduced any bills into the Senate. He is pretty much or was pretty much a go with the flow Senator. Hardly the type of person that you think should be running the most powerful country on the planet.

[FUZO]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

HE DIDNT DO SHIT IN THE SENATE,AND IT WAS BECAUSE HE IS PART BLACK THATS WHY HE GOT ELECTED.THE BLACK POPULATION CAME OUT IN RECORD NUMBERS AND THATS WHY HE GOT ELECTED.TAKE AWAY THE BLACK VOTE HE LOSES OR EVEN THIS THE LAST ELECTION PUT IN HOW MANY BLACK PEOPLE CAME OUT FOR BUSH ORTHE OTHER ONE AND PUT THAT NUMBER IN FOR OBAMA AND HE STILL LOSES

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

HE DIDNT DO SHIT IN THE SENATE,AND IT WAS BECAUSE HE IS PART BLACK THATS WHY HE GOT ELECTED.THE BLACK POPULATION CAME OUT IN RECORD NUMBERS AND THATS WHY HE GOT ELECTED.TAKE AWAY THE BLACK VOTE HE LOSES OR EVEN THIS THE LAST ELECTION PUT IN HOW MANY BLACK PEOPLE CAME OUT FOR BUSH ORTHE OTHER ONE AND PUT THAT NUMBER IN FOR OBAMA AND HE STILL LOSES

Don't forget about a lot of sympatehtic white votes too....a lot of white people voted for him also for the sole reason he is black...no other.

[Fit2bLarge]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

So basically what you're saying is that since you can't find it then you MUST be right? Just because you can't read/find it doesn't mean it gives any validity towards OR against your statement.

I'm sure the Political Forum gets pruned so there isn't so many threads in here as this is a fitness board

Before you go sticking words in people's mouths maybe you should ask them before making ASSumptions. Everything isn't so "black and white" as you want to make it to be.

I still haven't heard anyone agree nor disagree with my ASSumption? Then I must be right

silence speaks volumes

[Stout1]

Re: STIMULUS CHECK

I still haven't heard anyone agree nor disagree with my ASSumption? Then I must be right

silence speaks volumes

That is the most stupid and arrogant statement to a debate there is....since you can't find anything AGAINST your belief then you MUST be right. Sorry pal but in the real world it doesn't work that way. Maybe on the playground when your a little kid and want to stir up shit about someone or spread rumors then maybe that idealogy may have worked but in the real world where facts and numbers represent the truth then you're way of thinking is hogwash.

Try sticking around a few months this time before you go jumping the gun on your bandwagon.