Instant Access Registration Takes Less Than 15 Seconds! You May Not Post Until Registered.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble staying logged in when navigating between forums/topics/etc., you need to reset your session cookie. Go into your browser and delete any cookie for the site them log back in. This should fix the login issue.
we sent in inspectors, they found what, nothing not a ****ed thing
and i agree after 12 years of non-compliance he needed to be squeezed economically, gosh, they were basically bankrupt anyway
so, you had two of your famous LOGICAL CHOICES
A. economic blockades, which everyone in the un and world agreed too, cost to do this, well, let's see, 20 billion to put up blockades
b. start a war, have x amount of folks die, total now 500k, wounded over 100k, cost 1 trillion and growing, that means for a family of 4 it has now cost you 20k to go too war
c. now of course, smart money, loads up and leverages up on commodities, oil, gas, steel, etc., because in war u have too have them have too have them will pay anything for them
yup, sounds logical to me
don't forget mickey cain says he's not too good on economics, hope he learned the lesson, WAR....SMART MONEY BUYS AND LEVERS UP ON COMMODITIES, it's in every economic history book every written going back oh a good thousand years
What? Nearly bankrupt? Not even close. He was still selling oil through neighboring countries and enough to keep him going forever. Just like Stalin and Chairman Mao, he would have let everyone starve even if your bad arse blockade worked. A real humanitarian.
As far as not finding any WMD, there was specific intelligence that he purchased enriched uranium. This is something that could fit in something the size of a toy chest and we had to search all of Iraq which is the size of California. Let me have a one year head start, bury a toy chest somewhere in California and then YOU find it. Please!
No. The way we waged war is not and was not the only way to wage war. We could have done it in a way, where casualties were minimal or not happened.
Yeah, economic blockades on dictators only hurt those the dictator is ruling, not the dictator. Well he might have to only have 10 swimming pools instead of 20.
we sent in inspectors, they found what, nothing not a ****ed thing
and i agree after 12 years of non-compliance he needed to be squeezed economically, gosh, they were basically bankrupt anyway
so, you had two of your famous LOGICAL CHOICES
A. economic blockades, which everyone in the un and world agreed too, cost to do this, well, let's see, 20 billion to put up blockades
b. start a war, have x amount of folks die, total now 500k, wounded over 100k, cost 1 trillion and growing, that means for a family of 4 it has now cost you 20k to go too war
c. now of course, smart money, loads up and leverages up on commodities, oil, gas, steel, etc., because in war u have too have them have too have them will pay anything for them
yup, sounds logical to me
don't forget mickey cain says he's not too good on economics, hope he learned the lesson, WAR....SMART MONEY BUYS AND LEVERS UP ON COMMODITIES, it's in every economic history book every written going back oh a good thousand years
The intelligence was irrelevant. Saddam was in noncompliance with a cease-fire agreement (not to mention countless UN resolutions), which made it Saddam's responsibility to provide evidence that he had disabled his wmd's - HE DID NOT DO THAT = made cease fire agreement null and void, i.e. justified attack. Please show me a rational counter argument to that.
EXACTLY!!! i do know we agree on that 1000%...(now we gotta work that dog fighting thing out bro...your still wrong on that one)
lol, yeah, throw rove in jail and impeach bush, how do you think they sold the war
wmd, wmd, wmd, wmd
it's not only joe lunchbox, it's his boss, and his boss's boss
ummmmmm, only 7 memebers out of 500 in congress read the intelligence reports, everyone who did, 100% said it was bogus intelligence
so, in general most folks do not think for themselves, that's just life
The intelligence was irrelevant. Saddam was in noncompliance with a cease-fire agreement (not to mention countless UN resolutions), which made it Saddam's responsibility to provide evidence that he had disabled his wmd's - HE DID NOT DO THAT = made cease fire agreement null and void, i.e. justified attack. Please show me a rational counter argument to that.
BOTTOM LINE IS NONE OF US WILL KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPEN BUT EVERYONE WILL SPECUALTE AND KEEP BEATING UP BUSH.
i just beat him up becouse he's a retard...i dont really do that "hind sight 20/20" thing....i was with him on the information that we had at the time...britain, france, germany....whole dam world said he had them!!! so i wouldnt call him out on that....he's just a retard over all.
The one thing that the Republican need to look out for this election cycle is the Liberal catch phrases:
1. Clinton Impeachment
The senate listened to charges of purjury and obstruction of justice. The Liberals knew this evidence was irrefutable so they told joe lunchbox liberal voter (operating at a diminished mental capacity) that it was all about sex. Joe lunchbox wanting to sound like he has some brain cells was able to repeat the sex phrase but would never be able to comprehend the real charges so wanting to sound smart at the water cooler, he repeats the Liberal Kool Aide.
2. O.J. Trial (non political)
The prosecutor gets up there and explains DNA evidence, gentic mapping, motive, prior incidences... and then defense council get up and says "if the glove don't fit, you must aquit!" Once again, joe lunchbox wants to sound like he knows something so he parrots the only thing he understood.
We need to squash the Liberal catch phrases before Joe Lunchbox drinks the Kool Aid.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: