That old study is largely meaningless to the debate. Mainly because of the proposed dosage being 1/10th of that of the study. Also, Bobo - they still expect you to be able to provide an answer to the three questions regarding the metabolites.
Maybe you are assuming that the time the dbol is bound to the AR or the action of the metabolites is going to prevent recovery.
Maybe Billy and fonz assume that they do not affect recovery.
These ideas are only supported on theory and anecdotes. So, may I suggest we let people who like the idea to continue to profit from it and the ones who do not can seek out alternatives that work just fine for them?
Maybe you are assuming that the time the dbol is bound to the AR or the action of the metabolites is going to prevent recovery.
Maybe Billy and fonz assume that they do not affect recovery.
These ideas are only supported on theory and anecdotes. So, may I suggest we let people who like the idea to continue to profit from it and the ones who do not can seek out alternatives that work just fine for them?
Comment