Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

damn reading bout the dbol bridge is cofusing !

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Billy_Bathgate
    um ok...what is it then?
    Thats really all I wanted to see.

    Comment


    • #77
      No shit...I think he just lost it all right there.

      Take your pic though


      Synonyms: 1,3,5(10)-estratriene-3,17b-diol; 17beta-estradiol; 3,17-dihydroxy-delta(1,3,5-10)-estratriene; 3,17-epidihydroxyestratriene; beta-estradiol; dihydrofolliculin; dihydroxyestrin; Estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17beta-diol; Estradiol; Estradiol-17beta;

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by The REAL Bobo
        Thats really all I wanted to see.
        Right, I told you what it is, you dont think it is...so lets here it, what is it?

        I know what it is. I told you above lol



        Are you going to ignore this question like you are the other 3 as well? WOW!

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Juice Authority
          I don't get it, 17beta-estradiol is (E2). It's the same fucking thing. What are you talking about?
          Shhh....... The answer was alsready posted.


          Damnit your ruining all my fun!!!!

          Comment


          • #80
            all my textbooks say that E2 is 17-beta estradiol ... so i don't see what he means?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Billy_Bathgate
              No shit...I think he just lost it all right there.

              Take your pic though


              Synonyms: 1,3,5(10)-estratriene-3,17b-diol; 17beta-estradiol; 3,17-dihydroxy-delta(1,3,5-10)-estratriene; 3,17-epidihydroxyestratriene; beta-estradiol; dihydrofolliculin; dihydroxyestrin; Estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17beta-diol; Estradiol; Estradiol-17beta;

              Well Billy I think I'm getting through to you. Actuially doing some research helps!

              Comment


              • #82
                Um...ok....

                Comment


                • #83
                  Oh I found the anwers to your questions.

                  1. 1.324mg


                  2. Almost half that


                  3. 1.3234mg




                  I got this from my blood tests. I know how they are so valued here over any scientific basis whatsoever.



                  LMAO

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Thanks, you have finally proved my point.


                    Point is the following:

                    Neither of us can prove it either way. So it is assinine for either of us to say it HAS to work or it CANT work. All we have to go on is what works for our own selves!

                    Thanks bobo! Thats all you had to do.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Billy_Bathgate
                      Thanks, you have finally proved my point.


                      Point is the following:

                      Neither of us can prove it either way. So it is assinine for either of us to say it HAS to work or it CANT work. All we have to go on is what works for our own selves!

                      Thanks bobo! Thats all you had to do.

                      But my blood tests say's its so. You've shown me how studies and scientific deduction mean nothing to the medical community. LOL

                      You proved my point long ago that you didn't have a clue. Its ok, its not a crime.

                      Do me a favor and contact an endocrinologist. See what he thinks. I already know what he'll say but I want you to hear it from someone in person. If you can't find one, PM me and I will give you someone you can contact.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by The REAL Bobo
                        But my blood tests say's its so. You've shown me how studies and scientific deduction mean nothing to the medical community. LOL

                        You proved my point long ago that you didn't have a clue. Its ok, its not a crime.

                        Do me a favor and contact an endocrinologist. See what he thinks. I already know what he'll say but I want you to hear it from someone in person. If you can't find one, PM me and I will give you someone you can contact.
                        Good let it all be known that 10mg AM dbol DOES NOT WORK in Bobo.


                        You still cant admit you cant prove it on paper can you?

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          holy shit this one is even more complicated

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Billy_Bathgate
                            Good let it all be known that 10mg AM dbol DOES NOT WORK in Bobo.


                            You still cant admit you cant prove it on paper can you?
                            You can't prove that it will work. You can't show any scientific evidence to prove it let alone support it in any way. You can't show anything that even resembles this will work even with deduction from other sources. You can't show anything of any scientific value that even suggest a hint of evidence that this will work. In other words you have a theory backed up by absolutely nothing! You can't even show that this will "piggy back" a rise in test in the morning. You didn't even TRY to prove this would work. There is not one thing in your theory that has any shred of real evidence that the medical community would even consider! You didn't even understand the conepts behind it in the first place!! You left out so much information thaty it took three thread for you to even realize that you left out important infromation that would factor into this theory!!! We had to tell you!!!

                            If I went to a company to fund a study, I have a basic theory supporting by other sources of information. Its called deduction and I could conduct the study.


                            You on the other hand have no evidence. You have an extreme lack of understanding why it wouldn't work (we had to tell you). You have a study that actually goes against your theory!!! You would get laughed out of the building. Thats the difference between your arguements.


                            I have evidence suggesting it will not work.


                            You have nothing but opinion and fictitous blood tests. Hearsay. Would be thrown out of court but thank God were not there. You couldn't even speak then because you have nothing else.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              No you dont. You couldnt answer the 3 important factors.


                              I have said again and again I could prove on paper it would work on paper. I said that repeatedly.

                              You cant disproove it until you can answer those 3 answers. Your humorous attemp of your blood work was about what I expected from you though.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                I have evidence suggesting it will not work.
                                Good then you must be able to finally answer the 3 questions. Let us here it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X