Simple YES or NO answer

[smalls]

And to expand I dont think time on=time off approach works when your cycles get shorter. Just because you where only on for 4-5 weeks doesnt mean your body will be ready to go in 4 weeks.

[magnus]

js's second response was right on. The gear isnt going to be as effective if u go back on too soon and its putting a real lot of stress on ur body. i realize u were on a really long cycle i def suggest u give ur body 3 months off.

[Slightly Enhanced]

Originally posted by jsjs24
I see what you mean. I think you need to talk to someone like bdtr. Ask bdtr though...I think he can help. Good luck.

Did bdtr get a job or something...I haven't seen him around much lately.

[jsjs24]

Originally posted by Slightly Enhanced
Did bdtr get a job or something...I haven't seen him around much lately.

I think he hangs out on that new board www.ironbodybuilding.com more often now. It's a pretty nice board...you should check it out sometime.

[IntensityX]

NO

[Juicemonkey101]

I understand a lot of the NO answers, but guys, you HONESTLY think it would be better to not come off at all?? I guess i'm just surprised, i thought even a short amount of time OFF would have been better than to just keep running gear for even more of a extended time.

[orion76]

I think off time is only beneficial if you at least allow for your natural test production to come back, otherwise you might as well stay on. Less than 6 to 8 weeks is probably pointless.

So to answer your question, a 4 week break has no benefit IMHO.

[NeverSatisfied]

i think it's better than nothing, but a longer break would be better

[NeverSatisfied]

if ur gonna do it, def use hcg. it will help u come back quicker. then i'd run both clomid and nolva the entire 4 week break at a higher dosage than is usually recomended when taking a longer break