Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

    So, I'm watching Inside MMA and Bas Ruten says that he thinks the ground fighter is more dominant than the striker. He says that a striker can only KO you but a ground fighter can do with you what he wants....he can dislocate joints, break bones, etc....


    What are your opinions on this?
    "He woke up because I kept punching him in the face." --Thiago Alves

    "I'm telling you, once your car's been stolen, it never runs the same again. It's like a guy sleeping with your girl. He leaves his mark all over her."- Drama (Entourage)

  • #2
    Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

    Nope dont agree. I think a striker is much more potent. Break a jaw a nose a cheek bone a eye socket,ribs,liver shot
    Disclaimer: Steroid use is illegal in a vast number of countries around the world. This is not without reason. Steroids should only be used when prescribed by your doctor and under close supervision. Steroid use is not to be taken lightly and we do not in any way endorse or approve of illegal drug use. The information is provided on the same basis as all the other information on this site, as informational/entertainment value.

    Please take the time to read these threads!

    Fitness Geared Shoutbox rules

    FG member signature rules

    Fitness Geared Forum Rules

    http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/f334/

    http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/f283/

    https://www.tgbsupplements.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

      There is a reason they don't teach ground fighting to us in the special forces...
      They call you paranoid until the worst happens, and in the aftermath they will call you a hero.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

        i do both. in thai boxing we play mma from time to to time. i have never been KOd trying to take a camp mate down and once on the ground they are absolutely like a cockerspaniel vs a pit bull, i control them with easeand sub them quickly. now in a pure thai boxing match i would get busted up as i only have a little over a year of straight striking training and i am slow

        a good wrestler can take a great striker down and the striker is no longer a threat. and a striker MUST know how to stuff a shot or he is going down easily

        thats why i train grappling and thai boxing.

        from a purely self defense stance i choose striking as i dont want the guys buddy to stomp my face while i choke the guy who started the fight. but in sport fighting a pure striker vs a pure grappler. the grappler wins most of the time

        has everybody forgotten the skinny 175# gracie boy fighting 250# monsters like kimo and gerard gordeau?

        gracie had terrible take downs and still beat them

        look at high level grapplers that have fair striking ability like daniel cormier and ben askren. both guys are undefeated and started as basically pure grapplers.

        1 on 1 in sport fighting, grappler for sure.

        on the street a superior grappler takes me down i am gonna poke his eyes out
        "SHIAT BIOTCH, thats a big ass!"

        A clear concience is a sign of a bad memory.

        husband of the year

        moose riding maple syrup drinking flanel wearing canuck wannabe


        Comment


        • #5
          Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

          Originally posted by jipped genes View Post
          i do both. in thai boxing we play mma from time to to time. i have never been KOd trying to take a camp mate down and once on the ground they are absolutely like a cockerspaniel vs a pit bull, i control them with easeand sub them quickly. now in a pure thai boxing match i would get busted up as i only have a little over a year of straight striking training and i am slow

          a good wrestler can take a great striker down and the striker is no longer a threat. and a striker MUST know how to stuff a shot or he is going down easily

          thats why i train grappling and thai boxing.

          from a purely self defense stance i choose striking as i dont want the guys buddy to stomp my face while i choke the guy who started the fight. but in sport fighting a pure striker vs a pure grappler. the grappler wins most of the time

          has everybody forgotten the skinny 175# gracie boy fighting 250# monsters like kimo and gerard gordeau?

          gracie had terrible take downs and still beat them

          look at high level grapplers that have fair striking ability like daniel cormier and ben askren. both guys are undefeated and started as basically pure grapplers.

          1 on 1 in sport fighting, grappler for sure.

          on the street a superior grappler takes me down i am gonna poke his eyes out
          A little off topic, but do you train to fight or train for knowledge? I can't remember if I have heard you say or not.


          I agree with what you said by the way
          "He woke up because I kept punching him in the face." --Thiago Alves

          "I'm telling you, once your car's been stolen, it never runs the same again. It's like a guy sleeping with your girl. He leaves his mark all over her."- Drama (Entourage)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

            Heard a special forces hand to hand combat instructor once say, we train only upright, because if it goes to the ground, your dead...of course that is a little different than mma, but

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

              Getting on the ground in a choke hold and having some guys friends kick you in the head would suck ass.

              People on the ground are easy targets in bar fights, for bystanders who want to get in a free shot
              Last edited by Dzone; 02-19-2011, 01:33 AM. Reason: added some stuff

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

                I was actually thinking about this today. In a bar fight situation usually a good striker wins, but MMA style I would say grappler. I have seen good wrestlers get their azz beat in bar fights before on multiple occasions.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

                  ^ No doubt a hard blow to the face will totally disorient a person in a split second and may render him unconscious

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: More Dominant...ground fighter or striker?

                    Originally posted by tn94z View Post
                    A little off topic, but do you train to fight or train for knowledge? I can't remember if I have heard you say or not.


                    I agree with what you said by the way
                    i train to fight although i probably wont ever have a real fight unless i can find another 40 something year old guy my size. but i train right along the young guys who do fight

                    and i ramble because i am old LOL
                    "SHIAT BIOTCH, thats a big ass!"

                    A clear concience is a sign of a bad memory.

                    husband of the year

                    moose riding maple syrup drinking flanel wearing canuck wannabe


                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X