Tweet
Re: So Iran fires a missle
So because Pelosi doesn't come right out and say "I lied"; THE FACTS DON'T MAKE THAT CLAIM? I have answered your b.s. several times. Are we suppose to judge her on her bull$hit rhetoric and ignore the contradicting data? It has to suck trying to defend such blatant contradicting beliefs. But obviously, you feel content responding with "your not answering the question"; what constitutes an answer complying with your unsupported position?
See this is the problem with America. Your emotionally invested in Republicans or Newt or what ever the phuck it is and you can't lay aside your conditioned emotional response and even consider an opposing view as objective and true. You'd rather over-compensate your inability to support your position with disrespect but your debate tactics only work on other pragmatists that are also bluffing confidence in their ability to support their arguments and that is not me. So your style also gives away your pathetic attempt to defend a position that is not worthy of defense. I don't give a damn, the ignorant don't offend me but I will match their level of respect. You obviously don't enter a debate with the intentions of teaching and or learning but ridiculing those who don't agree with you - even when you can't support what you believe in. I always consider the source, your inability to defend your arguments only shows me your credibility is limited and that you have irrational position. If someone with limited credibility thinks I'm intelligent, it's only a coincidence; if they think I'm a fool - thats predictable and welcoming.
Can't have it both ways!! If you think it's good enough for statist Newt; it's good enough for the statist Libs. In other words, Pelosi is honest; Obama isn't a socialist and Guantanamo will be closed in 8 months (doesn't matter if it is; that would be contradicting to what has been said). We all know, that politicians never phucking lie.
So because Pelosi doesn't come right out and say "I lied"; THE FACTS DON'T MAKE THAT CLAIM? I have answered your b.s. several times. Are we suppose to judge her on her bull$hit rhetoric and ignore the contradicting data? It has to suck trying to defend such blatant contradicting beliefs. But obviously, you feel content responding with "your not answering the question"; what constitutes an answer complying with your unsupported position?
See this is the problem with America. Your emotionally invested in Republicans or Newt or what ever the phuck it is and you can't lay aside your conditioned emotional response and even consider an opposing view as objective and true. You'd rather over-compensate your inability to support your position with disrespect but your debate tactics only work on other pragmatists that are also bluffing confidence in their ability to support their arguments and that is not me. So your style also gives away your pathetic attempt to defend a position that is not worthy of defense. I don't give a damn, the ignorant don't offend me but I will match their level of respect. You obviously don't enter a debate with the intentions of teaching and or learning but ridiculing those who don't agree with you - even when you can't support what you believe in. I always consider the source, your inability to defend your arguments only shows me your credibility is limited and that you have irrational position. If someone with limited credibility thinks I'm intelligent, it's only a coincidence; if they think I'm a fool - thats predictable and welcoming.
Can't have it both ways!! If you think it's good enough for statist Newt; it's good enough for the statist Libs. In other words, Pelosi is honest; Obama isn't a socialist and Guantanamo will be closed in 8 months (doesn't matter if it is; that would be contradicting to what has been said). We all know, that politicians never phucking lie.
Comment