gay rights in the workplace

[BIGFOST]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

dont ask dont tell is a good way of thinking if your asking me.

[DJDIGGLER]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

Gay rights is fine.....Cross dressing is unacceptable for a business setting (or any setting in my opinion, lol). This should in no way be acceptable. Although having being gay has something to do with having some different gene, cross dressing is for people that aren't mentally right. Therefore a business shouldn't be forced to put it's reputation on the line for someone that is a mental case.

They belong in the mental ward. Simple as that.

[FUZO]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

regardless of your sexual orientation you still have rights..youre still a person and still contribute to society...

VERY TRUE BORN IN THE USA

[Merc]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

I dont see what your sexual preference has to do with work...If you are at work be professional and make it a work place dont bring your outside life their.

Also we all should support having trannies being put into the bill after all we all want mikey to work dont we LOL

[straydoglogic]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

You got that right! Next thing you know, murders will say they were born that way and they will have the right to kill. The world is going down the toilet and fast.

I know everyone has rights, but what makes one group feel they deserve MORE rights? That's BS!

i dont think that they expect more rights...just equality...and for the murderers comment...ive seen first hand what some gays go through and nobody would choose to deal with some of the biased and discrimination that they have to deal with..its not a choice its due to chromosomes...and i cant believe that putting murderers and gays in the same perspective is even considered a rational thought...

[daved150]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

i dont have a prob with gays. i perfer not to be one and cant really understand the choice (i understand the lesbien thing perfectly fine!!). crossdresser's...thats diff. gay's shouldnt be discriminated against...no-one should, but there's a line that cant be acceptable to cross in the work place. tranny's/crossdresser's would cross that line, imo.

[horsepwr]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

Well the point has been made a couple of times that there is something "off" or wrong with gays that they can't help. They are sick you could say. Just as a pedophile has something that's not right with them. I don't think a pedophile deserves the same rights and opportunity as people that aren't natrurally sexually attracted to children or sick in that way. I don't want a mentally sick person influencing my child in any way, period. I want to know that someone with a natural balance of chromosomes is making an impression on my child.
It sucks that gays have a chromosome disorder. I hope that science can help them someday so they don't have to deal with what they go through. People with an extra chromosome are limited through life as well.

[straydoglogic]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

its not like they are retarded or something...wow..murderers..pedophiles?...how could you compare that...they are not mentally sick and my brother is no worse than anybody else who passes judgement on him for being so closed minded that they cannot accept poeple for what and who they are...

[Klash]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

Just my opinion but sexuality should be a private matter, whether you like homosexual sex or not. It shouldn't be an issue and if an owner of a business wants to know your preferences in sex - that's phucked up and I wouldn't want to work their anyway, unless she was hot and curious because she wanted me.

I think gays are flamboyant because they don't have a very large pool of "participants", so to increase their chances of finding someone that would be comfortable with their "likes", they display it and essentially let their sexuality define them. If I was a business owner I would not want someone's sexuality on display all the time and I wouldn't hire them if they felt it had to be. Discrimination - yeah but a business owner should have that right; it's his business.

[straydoglogic]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

its funny cuz i had a gay friend that you would never know he was gay unless he told you and he absolutly HATED flamboyent gays..he would actually kick the **** out of them litterally if he saw them...he said it gave gays a bad name...and i just realized ive posted way too many times on this topic....lol

[pigmeat]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

i dont believe in EOE...i should be able to hire who i want for whatever reason ichoose, or dont choose

[horsepwr]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

yeah...where's my right to discriminate? You have to hire by discrimination of some sort, or there'd be no application process. There'd be no need for one.

[BIGFOST]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

I work with a lesbo. she talks about it and it gets on my nerves. i dunno why. Dont ask dont tell in a professional environment that isnt needed

[PL456]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

this whole issue is incorrect. homosexuality is a --behavior--; it should not be covered under civil rights. civil rights are in place to protect physical characteristics of people, things that are unavoidable...color, race, gender, pregnancy, age. The references to murderers, pedophiles is technically (although I certainly do not place gays in those groups) correct as these, too, are behaviors. No one is going to die if they do not have sex with someone of the same gender. It is a deviant, destructive behavior, a choice, in which a man or woman chooses to participate. You have no choice to be white, black, purple, male, female. Further, IMO, actions such as this push for gay rights is in line with affirmative action--which is also improper. Soon, we will have homosexuals who are not the superior applicant, sueing companies for "discrimination" when they do not get hired, just as blacks have done. Look for a homosexual-protective affirmative action push with your next democratically controlled government, as gay-rights groups are almost exclusively democratic-supporting as well as having a higher level of affluence, on average. The focus of the gay-"rights" movement is destruction of traditional marriage, traditional religion, traditional values. They wish to infect all aspects of traditional American life, from the Boy Scouts to the Catholic Church. I applaud the Catholic church in their stance against the homosexuals. I feel badly that the Episcopal and Methodist churches have apparently caved in and allowed homosexuals into positions of influence. Behaviors, my friends, choices we make, are what separate us from animals...

[Klash]

Re: gay rights in the workplace

this whole issue is incorrect. homosexuality is a --behavior--; it should not be covered under civil rights. civil rights are in place to protect physical characteristics of people, things that are unavoidable...color, race, gender, pregnancy, age. The references to murderers, pedophiles is technically (although I certainly do not place gays in those groups) correct as these, too, are behaviors. No one is going to die if they do not have sex with someone of the same gender. It is a deviant, destructive behavior, a choice, in which a man or woman chooses to participate. You have no choice to be white, black, purple, male, female. Further, IMO, actions such as this push for gay rights is in line with affirmative action--which is also improper. Soon, we will have homosexuals who are not the superior applicant, sueing companies for "discrimination" when they do not get hired, just as blacks have done. Look for a homosexual-protective affirmative action push with your next democratically controlled government, as gay-rights groups are almost exclusively democratic-supporting as well as having a higher level of affluence, on average. The focus of the gay-"rights" movement is destruction of traditional marriage, traditional religion, traditional values. They wish to infect all aspects of traditional American life, from the Boy Scouts to the Catholic Church. I applaud the Catholic church in their stance against the homosexuals. I feel badly that the Episcopal and Methodist churches have apparently caved in and allowed homosexuals into positions of influence. Behaviors, my friends, choices we make, are what separate us from animals...

Forgive me I don't keep up with the different christian denominations but doesn't Christian doctrine suggest sin is a sin. Homosexuality therefore would be no more a sin than heterosexuals lusting after females. Interesting enough there seems to be a correlation between homosexuals and being molested as a child by the same sex (not saying all homosexuals were molested but it seems people that were same sex molested as a child have less sexual boundaries when an adult when it comes to gender.) That would put the Catholic Church in a pretty sorry position in my opinion.


My whole thought on the idea is individuals have the right to discriminate against anyone they please; this includes individuals that own companies - no matter how big the company. If someone believes homosexuality is a behavior by choice and is deviant they have the right to discriminate against them. If someone else thinks practicing religion is a behavior by choice and is deviant they have the right to discriminate against them.