Instant Access Registration Takes Less Than 15 Seconds! You May Not Post Until Registered.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble staying logged in when navigating between forums/topics/etc., you need to reset your session cookie. Go into your browser and delete any cookie for the site them log back in. This should fix the login issue.
That is disturbing. So vaccines no longer contain any mercury? and, don't dentists use different materials for fillings now-a-days?
Some vaccines don't, some do. If a vaccine has less than a particular weight of mercury, which they describe as "trace amounts" they don't have to list it but when you take that into account with the number of vaccines kids get that can add up. Dentist still use mercury. Porcelain is an option but is more expensive.
i'm more worried about the "trace" amount of arsnic in my water!!! i have a couple silver (enamle covered) teeth that were replaced when i got my teeth knocked out, and thats it. the kids have a filling or 2, but they aint all gimped up on the floor and shyt, so i aint trippin.
HE WHO MAKES A BEAST OF HIMSELF, GET'S RID OF THE PAIN OF BEING A MAN!!
Sorry I've been away, My business actually has awoken from it's hibernation state.
Klash is 100% correct. Many of the things he posted were some of the things I was going to post.
The dentist thing he mentioned is true. Now let me elaborate a little. The ADA has a gag order on all dentists that they are not allowed to tell people the adverse effects of getting silver fillings which contain mercury that slowly releases into your body. Again it all goes hand in hand with government and pharmaceuticals. I personally wish I would've known this before I allowed my dentist to put a mouthful of metal in my mouth!
Hrspwer I'm sure your family members were wonderful nurses, and quite knowledgable at what they did. However have you ever heard the phrase "You can't teach an old dog new tricks?" People from their generation didn't have access to the internet, nor were there tons of declassified gov't documents to back up all of the corruption, and there weren't as many whisteblowers.
It's hard for the older generation to understand the mindset of the younger generation. They come from a more innocent and carefree time when you can leave your doors unlocked, families stayed together, communities were more united. Those times are nothing but a memory. This world is a much more dark place, and unfortunately it will get darker if people don't want to accept the truth and try to change things.
Going on with your everyday lives and acting like nothing is happening will not help future generations. It will only rob the future generations of the freedoms they also deserve.
BTW, my wife used to work at the CDC. She knows more than the average nurse she works with. The only reason she isn't still at the CDC is because we no longer live in MD, and moved to FL. There was no nearby office to transfer too. So she went to school to get her nursing degree. She's going back to get her doctorite.
i'm more worried about the "trace" amount of arsnic in my water!!! i have a couple silver (enamle covered) teeth that were replaced when i got my teeth knocked out, and thats it. the kids have a filling or 2, but they aint all gimped up on the floor and shyt, so i aint trippin.
Wow you too! We got our report and it had cyanide! CYANIDE! Flouride, arsenic, lead and a few others I can't remember the names of. Every single one of those things I listed were less than .01% under the legal limit. Yeah convenient. I bet if I did my own test it would show some above the limit. I find it way too coincidental that every amount was .01% under the dangerous level!
That's why I buy bottled gallons, and fill them manually at the local grocery store for 20 cents a pop. Practically comes out cheaper than using my tap water anyway.
Welcome back DJ, and yes, I couldn't agree more that with all the techmology, as Di Ali G would say, and whistleblowers not affraid to stand up and speak on valuable info that was otherwise kept private along with many other contributing factors, we have a much accelerated learning curve.
Wow you too! We got our report and it had cyanide! CYANIDE! Flouride, arsenic, lead and a few others I can't remember the names of. Every single one of those things I listed were less than .01% under the legal limit. Yeah convenient. I bet if I did my own test it would show some above the limit. I find it way too coincidental that every amount was .01% under the dangerous level!
That's why I buy bottled gallons, and fill them manually at the local grocery store for 20 cents a pop. Practically comes out cheaper than using my tap water anyway.
wait a min. my waters is well water...you get that shyt in city water?
HE WHO MAKES A BEAST OF HIMSELF, GET'S RID OF THE PAIN OF BEING A MAN!!
wait a min. my waters is well water...you get that shyt in city water?
Yes! It's probably worse than your well water. Actually I know it's worse. They send us a pamphlet every year from the county giving us a breakdown of what was found in our water. They found all of the things I mentioned all conveniently at .01% under the dangerous level. I'm sorry but looking at the possibility that so many contaminants happen to be all just .01% under the dangerous level is a little bit unbelievable. Just from a sheer numbers standpoint, the chances of them all being that same number is nearly impossible.
Btw, they outright admit they admit flouride into our water to protect peoples teeth (or so they claim). They say it's more for people that don't care as much for their teeth, but can also benefit those that do take good care of their teeth.
Well here's some generally unknown facts about the good ol flouride in our water.......
Fluoridation of Public Water
In 1947 Alcoa Aluminum’s lawyer, Oscar Ewing, headed the U.S Public Health Service. Fluoride was an industry's menace until Oscar Ewing, an Alcoa Aluminum lawyer, became head of the U.S. Public Health Service in 1947. “Alcoa was one of the biggest producers of hazardous fluoride waste at that time. Today, it is the phosphate fertilizer industries”. After this the government proceeded to experiment, without informed consent, to do water fluoridation experiments. In the subsequent years, after misinterpreting the data accrued from these experiments, the U.S. government began its push to fluoridate all public drinking water for the purpose of ensuring dental health. However, the mass fluoridation that proceeded to take place was not accomplished using calcium fluoride which occurs in all water, and fluoridation was not done to correct fluoride deficient water. Instead the silicofluoride pollutant producing industries were given the freedom to dispose of their hazardous waste in the public water supplies.
Problems with Fluoridation
The first objections to fluoridation have been its toxic health effects. Even in 1943 the Journal of the AMA stated that, “fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons — they inhibit enzyme systems, and water containing 1 part per million (ppm) or more fluoride is undesirable”. And not only has fluoride not been shown to prevent tooth decay, (See 1-5: New studies cast doubt on fluoridation benefits. Bette Hileman, Chemical & Engineering News, Vol. 67, No. 19, May 8, 1989), many indications have arisen that it poses a serious health risk. The health problems associated with artifical fluoride exposure are now being studied and include: arthritis, bone disease, reproductive, neurological, gastrointestinal, immunological, and renal issues along with problems with the pineal and thyroid glnds, cancers and dental fluorosis. It is also estimated that about 1% of our population are allergic or hypersensitive to fluoride. It is for these reasons that Japan, China and Europe rejected water fluoridation years ago and why the ADA and others in the U.S. are warning of fluoride over-exposure in infants. Dr. Edward Groth III has said that :
“Laws controlling the disposal of toxic wastes do not permit the industries creating these fluorides to release them into the environment. However, the laundering process of fluoridation allows these same toxins to be spread indiscriminately on lawns and gardens, incorporated into processed foods, and released by the ton into water and air, in sewer effluent and sludge. In other words, their solution to pollution is dilution”.
Even if one believes that the government honestly believed that fluoridation of water would help prevent tooth decay, many take issue with the idea of using public water as a conduit for mass medication. The sodium fluoride that is added to our water is not a naturally occurring substance and the FDA does not label it a nutrient. Thus, artificial fluoridation can only then be considered, and its usefulness has been purported in terms of its being a prophylactic medication. On the anti-fluoridation side of the fluoride debate, this mass medication violates one’s Constitutional guarantee to “pursue his own happiness to every man, and no arbitrary power exists within a Republic, even among a majority, to rob the minority, even if it be one individual, of this right”, as one Kentucky judge put it in his ruling against fluoridation (See 35-1: Kentucky Judge Defends Rights of Minority in Fluoridation of Water, 7/2/68).
So, the reasoning behind opposition to fluoridation come down to three basic things: 1) that fluoridation is a form of legalized pollution, 2) that the pretext for this corruption is the use of public water as a conduit for mass medication, 3) that not only is fluoride not a dental prophylactic, but it has been shown to be very harmful to human health.
holyshyt bro...thats fuked up!! i'll stick with the arsnic!!
oh, glad your little conspiratorial twisted up ass got some time to hang with us again....i think you had me right there bro...i was just about to buy in on ALL of it...insurance scams, government coverup's...all of it...but, you missed a little time and i may have loss my way....see what happens?
HE WHO MAKES A BEAST OF HIMSELF, GET'S RID OF THE PAIN OF BEING A MAN!!
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment