Instant Access Registration Takes Less Than 15 Seconds! You May Not Post Until Registered.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble staying logged in when navigating between forums/topics/etc., you need to reset your session cookie. Go into your browser and delete any cookie for the site them log back in. This should fix the login issue.
Klash it's awesome when you join debates! It's like sending bruce lee into a tai bo class to fight! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
LMAO!!! YA, HE IS PRETTY GOOD AT DEBATING. NOT TO TAKE AWAY FROM PL456. HE MAKES A STRONG CASE ALSO....VERY PASSIONATE IN HIS BELIEF'S. BUT, NO KLASH! I JUMPED INTO A THREAD ONCE AND HIM AND JOHNNY B (I THINK) OPENED A CAN OF WHOOP ASS ON ME QUICK!...FUNNY THING IS, I THINK THEY WERE DEBATING AGAINST EACHOTHER!!..EXCELLENT THREAD!
HE WHO MAKES A BEAST OF HIMSELF, GET'S RID OF THE PAIN OF BEING A MAN!!
LMAO!!! YA, HE IS PRETTY GOOD AT DEBATING. NOT TO TAKE AWAY FROM PL456. HE MAKES A STRONG CASE ALSO....VERY PASSIONATE IN HIS BELIEF'S. BUT, NO KLASH! I JUMPED INTO A THREAD ONCE AND HIM AND JOHNNY B (I THINK) OPENED A CAN OF WHOOP ASS ON ME QUICK!...FUNNY THING IS, I THINK THEY WERE DEBATING AGAINST EACHOTHER!!..EXCELLENT THREAD!
Thanks man! It's nice to know I don't piss off everybody.
btw: This is only the beginning of the new "left wing" supreme court we have appointed. Wait till you see more liberties and rights stipped from the american citizen in favor of gov't.
Thomas Jefferson - "When the government fears the people there is liberty; when the people fear the government there is tyranny."
btw: This is only the beginning of the new "left wing" supreme court we have appointed. Wait till you see more liberties and rights stipped from the american citizen in favor of gov't.
People should have known that when they elected Bush they just put America on the track to Marshall Law!
this is my last post in this thread..I am not hating on anybody..I have not resorted to name calling, etc. as others have. Its interesting that once a pro-lifer begins these debates, they are called everything in the book--even our President is brought into the discussion. Focus is so easily blurred to confuse and smokescreen the issue by those pro-"choicers" that know their argument is wrong, who know that stopping a heartbeat is murder.
I simply believe that once a woman becomes pregnant, there are 2 lives that are concerned. Hers and the baby's, some here are only concerned about the mother who got herself pregnant without the desire or ability to have and care for a child (and I am talking about the 99.5% elective abortions). I wish all babies to have a shot at life, some posters here do not. I do not think that a pregnant woman is one person. I do believe that a woman has the right to do anything to her body she wishes, but not to another person's--her baby's, some people here want to take away this most basic right to life the innocent baby has. I believe life starts at the point of conception, some people here do not--yet they do not really seem to want to pin down when life starts. For example, how can a doctor extract a 39 week old baby from the uterus, killing it (legal abortion), but, the second a baby is born at forty weeks it becomes murder? This makes no sense to me. Therefore, any action taken by a woman or a doctor that ends the baby's life is the killing of an innocent person. I realize that others do not feel this way. I realize others want to have easy and quick shirking of responsibility (morning after pill), I realize that others want cheap and easy sex with no consequences. I hope and pray that our country turns back to the Judeo-Christian values that it was founded on and turns away from this "elightenend" way of thinking it that nothing has consequences and nobody has responsibility. I personally think that this will not happen. I believe that our country has passed a point of no return, slipping into this mindless, godless, immoral belief system of the europeans. This of course, was all predicted thousands of years ago...as some might know. I am not afraid of this, however. I am confident in my beliefs and my relationship with God..are you? That is my rhetorical question.
Yeah I'm confident with my relationship with god. But in that confidence I still don't push my beliefs on people like you and your type! Maybe I should go around and start force feeding people food they don't like because I think they should like it. Makes just as much sense as your ways!
Yeah I'm confident with my relationship with god. But in that confidence I still don't push my beliefs on people like you and your type! Maybe I should go around and start force feeding people food they don't like because I think they should like it. Makes just as much sense as your ways!
You should start with the Olson twins, then the Hilton sisters.
US President George W. Bush signalled his opposition to a South Dakota abortion ban that forbids the procedure even in cases of rape or incest, saying he favors such exceptions.
But Bush declined to predict the outcome of any legal challenges to the legislation, which would make it illegal to terminate a pregnancy except in rare cases when it may be necessary to save the life of the mother.
"That, of course, is a state law, but my position has always been three exceptions: Rape, incest, and the life of the mother," the US president told ABC news in an interview.
Asked whether he would include "health" of the mother, Bush replied: "I said life of the mother, and health is a very vague term, but my position has been clear on that ever since I started running for office."
The bill, which recently gained final approval from South Dakota's House of Representatives, directly contradicts the precedent set in 1973 when the US Supreme Court ruled that bans on abortion violate a woman's constitutional right to privacy.
The bill grants no allowances for women who have been raped or are victims of incest. Doctors who perform abortion would be charged with a crime. It also prohibits the sale of emergency contraception and asserts that life begins at fertilization.
The governor of South Dakota has indicated he is likely to sign the bill.
A leading pro-choice advocacy group has already vowed to challenge the ban in federal court. But that seems to be exactly what many promoters of the legislation seek.
Advocates of the ban do not deny they aim much higher than South Dakota, a rural and socially conservative state, which even today has only one abortion clinic.
Instead, they are hoping the bill will offer a full frontal assault on legal abortions now that the balance of power in the Supreme Court appears to have shifted with the confirmation of conservative jurists John Roberts and Samuel Alito, both of whom are seen as pro-life.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment