CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

[mikeyg51]

Which one do you all prefer? I currently am taking WITHOUT DAC because I was told it is superior to the more expensive, longer-acting with DAC....I do 100mcg approx 2-3x per day along with 250mcg ghrp-2 2-3x per day

[Bane82]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

Hmm . . . I've always used w/o DAC, too! There's an actual reason why I do, but I can't think of it at the moment! It seems like there's something about DAC that's bad for you! I wish I could remember exactly what it is, but oh well!

[animal87]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

What kind of results do you guys get off this? Is it better than hgh? I know people that have ran gh but not any of these peps, so i don't know if its worth the bother. I know their cheaper hgh is way outta my price range.

[Bane82]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

They basically empty out the bodies own gh from the pituitary gland! No! Their not better than actual gh, but they do work! I've noticed an increase in appetite, better quality sleep, fuller rounder muscle bellies, and some weight loss!

[whitetail]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

Without DAC causes a pulse in gh. With DAC it causes a bleed effect. Pulse is superior because it mimics the bodies natural pulses vs a gh bleed due to long half life of DAC.

[animal87]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

I'm still young enough i shouldn't need any of it but it's nice to know for the future, i've always had terrible problems sleeping so I'm sure I'm not getting the full benefit for natural gh.

[jamescb77]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

Depending on who you ask will depend on the answer you get. With dac you will have to take a break as eventually the pituitary just can't keep up. Without dac you really don't have that problem as its one big pulse and the. You let it rest for a few hours.

[mikeyg51]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

James is the man when it comes to HGH and peptides, I've learned from him! But I will say that it is different than taking HGH...I do both actually, per James' suggestion...cjc and ghrp-2 throughout the day and HGH only at bedtime about 4iu....I absolutely love peptides and growth

[jamescb77]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

James is the man when it comes to HGH and peptides, I've learned from him! But I will say that it is different than taking HGH...I do both actually, per James' suggestion...cjc and ghrp-2 throughout the day and HGH only at bedtime about 4iu....I absolutely love peptides and growth

That's a good protocol and yes they are different but both good in own regards.

[mikeyg51]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

I am thinking of trying this new cjc-1295 and Ipamorelin blend that this peptide company manufacturers....only thing is it comes 5g of each and that means that you have to take equal amounts of both...I always did 100mcg cjc and 250mcg ipam or ghrp...could I get away with 250 of each or even 100 of each?

[jamescb77]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

Personally I would not buy a blend but that's me. Everyone says that these degrade when put I to the same vial and should be kept separate. I don't know how much truth but why risk it. Also since I have never seen a mix like this before I will wait until I see more companies going to it and people actually getting results. I like my money and don't like to waste it so I try and play it safe.

[jamescb77]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

Oh and yes 100/100 would be enough to get results although with iPad you would be in the low side. With the ghrp's you would be good to go.

[sofargone561]

Re: CJC-1295 w/o DAC vs CJC-1295 DAC

never ran it. going to probably add ghrp6 and cjc no dac. everyone who ive talked to about it are big guys and vetts so if they say no dac i run no dac lol never knew why really