Tweet
Originally posted by superchicken
well, actually she may have a point........butnot like she thinks.
lets assume you stayed on slin for almost every hour of the day everday for a long time. MAYBE this will cause problems. its safe to say most people do fear long continued heavy use of slin. but our short intermittant cycles imo are very low risk.
now i do see a potential problem if i used slin at bodybuilding doses 3-4x ed for a yr. when i stopped i would imagine my body will now react diff to slin, im guessing it would be less sensitive to it. this means maybe your body can no longer make enough slin thus requiring you to take some exogenous to assist.
now if hum r is active for about 2x as long as log, then if you took log compared to hum r, you would actually be under the effect of slin for half the time with log compared to r.
so IF long constnat slin use does pose a potential risk, which i think it does, then yes r would be more damaging than log. say you took log 3x ed. thats let say 2hrs x 3 shots =6 hours of active time. now witsh to r, thats now 4hrs x 3 shots = 12 hours active.
so yes she does have a point.
is it significant? probabaly not. we dont evenknow if slin can cause diabeteies yet. regardless i think we can all agree on one point, and thats its prob a good and safe idea to cycle slin and give breaks. so even in that case, r is still leaving you under the influence of slin for twice as long. but we dont know if time under the influence of slin has anything negative to our health. but i would imagine it does in SOME form or shape.
well, actually she may have a point........butnot like she thinks.
lets assume you stayed on slin for almost every hour of the day everday for a long time. MAYBE this will cause problems. its safe to say most people do fear long continued heavy use of slin. but our short intermittant cycles imo are very low risk.
now i do see a potential problem if i used slin at bodybuilding doses 3-4x ed for a yr. when i stopped i would imagine my body will now react diff to slin, im guessing it would be less sensitive to it. this means maybe your body can no longer make enough slin thus requiring you to take some exogenous to assist.
now if hum r is active for about 2x as long as log, then if you took log compared to hum r, you would actually be under the effect of slin for half the time with log compared to r.
so IF long constnat slin use does pose a potential risk, which i think it does, then yes r would be more damaging than log. say you took log 3x ed. thats let say 2hrs x 3 shots =6 hours of active time. now witsh to r, thats now 4hrs x 3 shots = 12 hours active.
so yes she does have a point.
is it significant? probabaly not. we dont evenknow if slin can cause diabeteies yet. regardless i think we can all agree on one point, and thats its prob a good and safe idea to cycle slin and give breaks. so even in that case, r is still leaving you under the influence of slin for twice as long. but we dont know if time under the influence of slin has anything negative to our health. but i would imagine it does in SOME form or shape.
Comment