Tweet

coulda been stopped by bush 2 also!! and the first wtc attack coulda been stopped by bush 1

bush 1 had nothing to do with the wtc attacks now this is all getting to being bush hatred plain and simple and now arguing if bush 1 had something to do with this. wtc had nothing to do with bush 1.this was all the democratic clinton democratic congress.but since you and others hate bush ofcourse thats what would be said. but bottom line is the hatred you and some others see of bush came later in his presidency when the democrats controlled congress.lets start looking up the facts like how ive always preached in this forum instead of assuming. we know for a fact that al-Queda started the pre 911 attacks under clinton

TweetBUSH 1 WAS ON THE WAY OUT NO DESTRUCTIONS OF THE USA WERE BEING PLOTTED AGAINST THE USA UNDER BUSH. NO CIA ITEL DETERMINED THAT. IT WAS UNDER CLINTON. PLEASE READ ABOUT IT. tHE HATRED PEOPLE HAVE FOR BUSH IS JUST PLAIN DUMB.WHEN THE DEMOCRATS HAD THE POWER IN CONGRESS


On December 29, 1992,[5] the first attack by Al Qaeda was carried out in Aden, Yemen.[1][6][7] That evening, a bomb went off at the Gold Mohur hotel, where U.S. troops had been staying while en-route to Somalia, though the troops had already left when the bomb exploded. The bombers targeted a second hotel, the Aden Movenpick, where they believed American troops might also be staying. That bomb detonated prematurely in the hotel car park, around the same time as the other bomb explosion, killing two Australian tourists.[5][6] Bin Laden later claimed responsibility for the 1992 Yemen attack.[1]

The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when Ramzi Yousef parked a rented van full of explosives in the parking garage beneath the World Trade Center. The explosion claimed six victims, and over one thousand people were wounded. Ramzi Yousef, the nephew of 9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, had trained in Afghanistan. Though, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed did not join Al Qaeda until 1998. Yousef worked in cooperation with the blind sheikh Abdul Rahman who was living across the Hudson, in Jersey City, at the time of the attack. The FBI later turned up evidence that Osama bin Laden provided financial support to the blind sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman.[8]

Ramzi Yousef and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (prior to joining with Al Qaeda) planned Operation Bojinka, a plot to destroy airplanes in mid-Pacific flight using explosives.[9] They tested their attacks in November 1994 on the Philippine Airlines Flight 434, which also involved Abu Sayyaf (a Southeast Asia affiliate of Al Qaeda).[10] An apartment fire in Manila, Philippines exposed the plan before it could be carried out. Yousef was arrested, but Mohammed evaded capture until 2003.[11]



In December 1999 and into 2000, al-Qaeda planned attacks against U.S. and Israeli tourists visiting Jordan for millennial celebrations; however, Jordanian authorities thwarted the planned attacks and put 28 suspects on trial. Part of this plot included the planned bombing of LAX, but this plot was foiled when bomber Ahmed Ressam was caught at the US-Canadian border with explosives in the trunk of his car. Al-Qaeda also planned to attack the USS The Sullivans on January 3, 2000, but the effort failed due to too much weight being put on the small boat meant to bomb the ship.

Despite the setback with the USS The Sullivans, al-Qaeda succeeded in bombing a U.S. warship in October 2000 with the USS Cole bombing. German police foiled a plot to destroy a cathedral in Strasbourg, France in December 2000.





BINLADEN STARTED PLAINING THE ATTACK OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER CLINTON NOT BUSH 1. HE HAD OTHER ATTACKS AROUND THE WORLD NOT IN THE USA UNTIL CLINTON HAD ARRIVED. IT HAPPEN UNDER CLINTON HE COULD OF STOPPED THE REST. SO BUSH 1 HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS

TweetIf WTC 1 happened under Bush 2 Bin Ladin wouldn't have lived to see 1994.

Tweet

Originally Posted by whitetail

If WTC 1 happened under Bush 2 Bin Ladin wouldn't have lived to see 1994.

MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY

Tweet

Originally Posted by whitetail

If WTC 1 happened under Bush 2 Bin Ladin wouldn't have lived to see 1994.

ok...like he didnt live to see 2005,2006,2007,2008,2009...lol

Tweetso what your saying fuzzy, is they planned, and got there shyt together to hit the wtc, the first time, in 30days?? wow,,,those are some pretty proficiant fukers! we shoulda hired them at the dmv!! takes me 45 days to renew my licence!

and yes...you can call it "bush hating" if you want...i think of it more along the lines of "recognizing a failed manager". i actually would'nt mind sitting back and drinking a beer with the guy. always seemed like my kinda people. just becouse i feel he's a horrible manager dosnt mean i hate the guy!!! and, i "hate" clinton more, if that counts. i dont even think i could share a few beers with him! he's just an asshole.

Tweet

Originally Posted by whitetail

If WTC 1 happened under Bush 2 Bin Ladin wouldn't have lived to see 1994.

lol, he sure has paid for the second attack..we cant get him in 8 years, but you think we could have got in then in months

Tweet

Originally Posted by pigmeat

lol, he sure has paid for the second attack..we cant get him in 8 years, but you think we could have got in then in months

I think it would have been a bit easier at that point in time. Maybe I'm wrong about getting him, but dead or alive he wouldn't be able to plan WTC2 from inside a cave.