What to do if you encounter a anti-war activist!

[YellowJacket]

Originally posted by gongshow
and we have a hardass on the board!!! Lol jk man...your opinion of being antiwar is totally respected by me...I guess Im talking about the people that lay down in streets, and protest this shit till there red in the face....

Understood. Im not 100% anti-war, Im anti- the way things are being handled. I wouldnt sit in the street with a sign that says "Stop the Bushit" or anything like that. But to talk about shooting and kicking the shit out of war protestors, I mean come on, to each his own, not respecting someone's legit opinion is a good way to inhale your last breath.

[grimek]

Originally posted by YellowJacket
But to talk about shooting and kicking the shit out of war protestors, I mean come on, to each his own, not respecting someone's legit opinion is a good way to inhale your last breath.

I thought it was more about showing the anti-war arguement in simple terms than actually advocating smacking someone. I'm strongly in favor of the military action's being taken because I take seriously threats (both spoken and not) from terrorists and self described enemy states. I don't necessarilly want to see any anti-war protesters smacked.

Just my legit opinion.

[morebeefplease]

Originally posted by blm9376
It's when they say "no violence, no war" and they are smashing windows and fighting cops or blocking traffic.

ironic huh., protesters take away the resources of law protection agencies which protect them. police in seattle can't take non-emergency calls due to need for man power to control anti-war riots. it costs san fransico $900,000 a day in riot control which will add to their already huge budget deficet(SP)

[morebeefplease]

Originally posted by blm9376
the poor souls that are over there dealing with his piss poor planning first hand. And as many mixed feelings that I do have w/this current situation, if I got called back I would be honored to go.

what piss poor planning are you refering to?

[34pumped]

Originally posted by gongshow
haha, you shit kick them, on site....

ha ha yes thats what u do..

[AnabolicAnimal]

"revenge is immoral, and that by attacking the people who did
this to us, we will only bring on more violence" why does it seem like when you use the word "people" your grouping together all muslims or all middle easterners when they didnt' attack america. a extermist terriost group attacked america, iraq NEVER attacked america, america is attacking iraq on susipission of haveing weapons of mass distruction....no wait it's because of a horrable form of government with repressed people(north korea, cuba...ect) no wait it's really cause we can use the the publics low opnioin of middle easterners/muslims to our advantage and attack a country that contains 20% of the worlds oil reservers under the guise of freedom for it's people who 1. we could give a fuck about cause cubans are in the same boat(shitty conditions dicatitorship) but all they have to offer is major leauge prospects and not good old black gold. 2. if we cared about people other then americans we'd help out practily ANY afarican nation. but deep down inside i'd really like to belive bush and his buddies are doing what's best for the american people even though they just issued a contract to an american oil company (who rumsfield was ceo of at one time) to use iraq's oil fileds after the war. but deep down i'm hoping bush is correct in killing people so americans can drive their SUV's at a cheaper price....um i mean kill people in order to liberate them...yeah that's it....(sorry for the spelling in a rush to vent my fustration about people's ignorance)

[BigSoda]

I was in DC 2 days ago when I couldn't get through because they had blocked the road ,I asked nicely a few times beeped the horn a few more times,then finally my I lost my shit and got out and had words and they let me through.

[grimek]

Originally posted by blm9376
"I feel" that Bush was in too much of a hurry to get this underway. I don't think he had enough units mobilized to start off. As everyone can see, the Iraqi forces were highly under estimated. I realize that the military planning does not fall under Bush's responsibility, but moving the plan forward does. As I stated, these are my personal feelings and I refuse to get into a thread war w/anyone that disagrees

This war is seven days old. Mind if I ask what your expectations were???

[grimek]

Originally posted by AnabolicAnimal
"revenge is immoral, and that by attacking the people who did
this to us, we will only bring on more violence" why does it seem like when you use the word "people" your grouping together all muslims or all middle easterners when they didnt' attack america. a extermist terriost group attacked america, iraq NEVER attacked america, america is attacking iraq on susipission of haveing weapons of mass distruction....no wait it's because of a horrable form of government with repressed people(north korea, cuba...ect) no wait it's really cause we can use the the publics low opnioin of middle easterners/muslims to our advantage and attack a country that contains 20% of the worlds oil reservers under the guise of freedom for it's people who 1. we could give a fuck about cause cubans are in the same boat(shitty conditions dicatitorship) but all they have to offer is major leauge prospects and not good old black gold. 2. if we cared about people other then americans we'd help out practily ANY afarican nation. but deep down inside i'd really like to belive bush and his buddies are doing what's best for the american people even though they just issued a contract to an american oil company (who rumsfield was ceo of at one time) to use iraq's oil fileds after the war. but deep down i'm hoping bush is correct in killing people so americans can drive their SUV's at a cheaper price....um i mean kill people in order to liberate them...yeah that's it....(sorry for the spelling in a rush to vent my fustration about people's ignorance)

wtf??? lol....You totally skipped right over Roswell and the Tri-Lateral Commission.

btw, I think you mean Cheney, not Rumsfeld, was the CEO. Still, I appreciate your helping us all work through our ignorance.

[unbreakable]

Originally posted by AnabolicAnimal
"revenge is immoral, and that by attacking the people who did
this to us, we will only bring on more violence" why does it seem like when you use the word "people" your grouping together all muslims or all middle easterners when they didnt' attack america. a extermist terriost group attacked america, iraq NEVER attacked america, america is attacking iraq on susipission of haveing weapons of mass distruction....no wait it's because of a horrable form of government with repressed people(north korea, cuba...ect) no wait it's really cause we can use the the publics low opnioin of middle easterners/muslims to our advantage and attack a country that contains 20% of the worlds oil reservers under the guise of freedom for it's people who 1. we could give a fuck about cause cubans are in the same boat(shitty conditions dicatitorship) but all they have to offer is major leauge prospects and not good old black gold. 2. if we cared about people other then americans we'd help out practily ANY afarican nation. but deep down inside i'd really like to belive bush and his buddies are doing what's best for the american people even though they just issued a contract to an american oil company (who rumsfield was ceo of at one time) to use iraq's oil fileds after the war. but deep down i'm hoping bush is correct in killing people so americans can drive their SUV's at a cheaper price....um i mean kill people in order to liberate them...yeah that's it....(sorry for the spelling in a rush to vent my fustration about people's ignorance)

Relax man. This was not written by Phyzed. I saw this a long time ago. He just used it as a joke (I think). I don't think that he was "grouping" people together. It was just a joke.

[PhyzEd]

No shit! It "WAS" a joke!
I do think instead of protesting the war, these idiots could be spending their time more productively. ie: helping out with charities, supporting our troops and keeping their asses at home so the fucking police can center their full attention towards fighting crime instead of keeping the peace with a bunch of bleeding heart liberals who are just upset that Bush is president and is doing what he can to make sure you and I maintain our freedom here in the United States!
Anyone who opposes, I hear the Iraqian army is recruiting. TAKE YOUR ASS!!!

[AnabolicAnimal]

i appoligize about going off on a rant about the war phyzed. i don't want to start some posting thing we all got our opnions. i was just pissed off about reading another thing about "those people" again. i'm from a city in new jersey where it seems like very few people have any clue what's going on and just take evertthign the government says as totally true and correct. to never question the actions of your government is the same as having a dictatorship. sometimes you have to wonder "are they doing what's best for me? or them?" this is one of those times to me. i'm anti-war cause i've studied history and seen what war really is, and who gains the most from wars, and it's not the men and woman who fight them.anyway just wanted to appoligize for any comments that might have pissed you off, i'm here to learn more about anabolics and not try to enrage people. (yeah grimek it was cheeny my mistake)

[Kristylynn]

Re: What to do if you encounter a anti-war activist!

LMAO, that is some funny shit

[3Vandoo]

I encounter peace wannabe every fucking days.


and NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOO

you will get your ass kicked!!!!!!

Peace Activist = MANIAC Pyscho freak with Kalanischov under their coat!!!