Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

[horsepwr]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

^that's him.

I'm right with ya Fuzo. I'm always eading up on history and points in time that changed history, and changed America. The men that constructed The Constitution worked tirelessly to build a Republic of freedom. They wrote up a masterpiece for as near perfect state of liberty, free will, and minimal government as possible. Our founding fathers new well what they were avoiding. Which was the tyrannica government they fled of European countries...oppressive monarchy, totalitarianism, etc...complete government control. They found a great land and created the best form of government ever known before which was minimal. A Republic where the individual had absolute liberty. Free will. Freedom. The Constitution gave just enough government to control crime. And crime had a clear definition. You did not commit violence against others, or infringe others liberty. Fraud, theft, violence against another free individual. That's crime. And it worked great for 100-120yrs. Then came new laws. Prohibition. Prohibition created violence. Laws against freedom create violence. Violence is crime.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-- Thomas Jefferson 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334--

I borrowed this from wikipedia:
--"Thomas Jefferson (April 13, 1743 – July 4, 1826)[2] was the third President of the United States (1801–1809), the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and one of the most influential Founding Fathers for his promotion of the ideals of republicanism in the United States. Major events during his presidency include the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and the Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804–1806)..."

Republicanism is the basis for The Constitution as well as The Bill of Rights. The original first 10 Bill of Rights, which are written specifically to reinforce individual freedom. They were written for the individual!
Republicanism is the basis, the foundation, of this country.

Don't let many of these plastic people of today, that have hi-jacked the (R), run you away from the original Republican, conservative agenda.

[JsJs24]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

^that's him.



"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-- Thomas Jefferson 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334--

I borrowed this from wikipedia:
--"Thomas Jefferson (April 13, 1743 – July 4, 1826)[2] was the third President of the United States (1801–1809), the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and one of the most influential Founding Fathers for his promotion of the ideals of republicanism in the United States. Major events during his presidency include the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and the Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804–1806)..."

Republicanism is the basis for The Constitution as well as The Bill of Rights. The original first 10 Bill of Rights, which are written specifically to reinforce individual freedom. They were written for the individual!
Republicanism is the basis, the foundation, of this country.

Don't let many of these plastic people of today, that have hi-jacked the (R), run you away from the original Republican, conservative agenda.

Thomas Jefferson is my favorite president and just to let you know in case you don't already, he was a libertarian.

[straydoglogic]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

I will not vote for paul because he does not beleive in war. He would withdraw the troops if he was in office.

Just wanted to let you know that I am now on terminal leave, and wore the uniform for the very last time in my life Thursday morning. And a lot of it had to do with Ron Paul and me being against the war. What's wrong with peace? I like peace. I will never again put on that uniform, and it feels pretty darned good.

[straydoglogic]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

Ron Paul is a Republican but used to be a Libertarian and has a strong relationship with the Libertarian party.

The judge you are referring to is Judge Andrew Napolitano. He is good and I always watch him when he fills in for Beck. In some ways I like him better because he really does understand the constitution since he is a former judge. He makes sound arguments in defending the constitution.

Don't forget to watch the Judge on his internet show Freedom Watch. It's a great show and I hope it get's a chance to go mainstream. Paul/Napolitano 2012!!!
Oh, and now they have another Libertarian in John Stossell!!! Awesome!!

[straydoglogic]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

Just little fyi...Republicanism is what was once knows as Classical Liberalism, which is what we know today as Libertarianism. So in all actuality, a Libertarian today is what a Republican once was, so us Libertarians are the true Republicans, as is Dr. Ron Paul...

[horsepwr]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

"true Republicans".
There are now so many terms people attach themselves in attempt to avoid identifying with corruption. No matter the title you choose, libertarian, conservative, constitutionalist, there are people of opposing ideals that latch onto these terms as well. There was no Republican party when The Constitution was written. There was republicanism, which is what was the basis of The Constitution and Bill of Rights. We are...were a Republic. That made this country a Republican nation. The original documentation for this nation is based on republicanism. I'm a Republican. We've taken words, titles and so on, and one word can have 5 different definitions. Look what leftist have done to the term liberal.
I'm a Republican. Do you ever wonder why a man like Dr. Ron Paul, that knows history like the back of his hand, holds onto that (R)? For some reason, I don't think he's just latched on to it for politics. He doesn't strike me as that guy. I could be wrong. I don't know him personally.

[deepsouth]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

I do believe the fall of Ron Paul was his stance on the war. As far as the economy, he is by far the best person for the job, but we must also have someone who is strong on defense of our Nation. If he would ever man up in that area, he would go all the way. Not saying with the way things currently are, he doesn't have a darn good chance

[JsJs24]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

Just wanted to let you know that I am now on terminal leave, and wore the uniform for the very last time in my life Thursday morning. And a lot of it had to do with Ron Paul and me being against the war. What's wrong with peace? I like peace. I will never again put on that uniform, and it feels pretty darned good.

Congrats on separating from the military and thank you for your service. I got out in May 2005. I proudly served and still have a career tied to the military, however I too view things differently thanks to Ron Paul, Freedom Force International, and the founding fathers. None of the founders like the war, and only believed it was necessary to achieve our freedom. Today it seems we pick wars with countries in the name of preserving freedom when we are actually creating democracies all over the world, which will eventually lead to totalitarianism. Still, I am against terrorism but do not think it is necessary to destroy an entire country and set up a new government. We can't change their ways of thinking, however we can defeat the terrrorists by capturing key leaders and stopping their money supply. The money is the key enabler, yet we continue to allow organizations such as CARE to continue to operate and fund terrorism with a front that purports to support regular Muslims.

[JsJs24]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

Don't forget to watch the Judge on his internet show Freedom Watch. It's a great show and I hope it get's a chance to go mainstream. Paul/Napolitano 2012!!!
Oh, and now they have another Libertarian in John Stossell!!! Awesome!!

Stossell is a great guy imo, and he is from 60 minutes if you remember that. Good show but glad he is now on Fox where he can voice his views to a wider audience.

[FUZO]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

I will never again put on that uniform

YOUR SAYING YOU WILL NEVER FIGHT FOR THE UNITES STATES OF AMERICA IF THEY NEED YOU

[JsJs24]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

"true Republicans".
There are now so many terms people attach themselves in attempt to avoid identifying with corruption. No matter the title you choose, libertarian, conservative, constitutionalist, there are people of opposing ideals that latch onto these terms as well. There was no Republican party when The Constitution was written. There was republicanism, which is what was the basis of The Constitution and Bill of Rights. We are...were a Republic. That made this country a Republican nation. The original documentation for this nation is based on republicanism. I'm a Republican. We've taken words, titles and so on, and one word can have 5 different definitions. Look what leftist have done to the term liberal.
I'm a Republican. Do you ever wonder why a man like Dr. Ron Paul, that knows history like the back of his hand, holds onto that (R)? For some reason, I don't think he's just latched on to it for politics. He doesn't strike me as that guy. I could be wrong. I don't know him personally.

We could go on and on about parties and what they mean. Originally there were the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans, then later came the Whig Party. However, it all comes down to two political philosophies or ideologies which are Collectivism and Individualism.

Anyone who has read Ayn Rand will understand why these are the only two ideologies that are apparent in the world. Rand of course developed Objectivism, which supports individualistic behavior.

Anyone who is not aware of Collectivism and Individualism I suggest you read up on them, for they are the only ideologies which matter. Collectivism is unfortunately what our government practices and will lead to the end of our freedoms. Anyone who doubts this does not understand what it is. Forget about parties for they do not matter. I know that many of you are aware that I am a Libertarian, however that is because it is the party which represents Individualism. I am a believer in a true free market system, something which we have never had in this country. Collectives on the other hand are against the individuals succeeding and do not believe people are smart enough to make their own choices, thus the government intervenes in our lives to stop Individualism at any cost necessary. The future of our world is one ruled by the collective elite, and we probably won't be able to stop it ultimately, but instead slow it down every so often. Government has increased in size and power consistently since our inception, with only a few decent presidents to temporarily halt it. The issues of today are the most serious in our history because we are entering the final stages of a New World Order. You can shun at my remark all you want, but the facts are their if you simply take the time to research the issue. The climate change bill, health care bill, and cap and trade bill are in my opinion the final steps the elite is taking before their plan will be complete. You must realize the power that the governments of the world will have once these are in place. The global elite (Collectivists) own the banks, media outlets, and the politicians, which all work in their favor to achieve world dominance and make all of the little people their slaves. We will all be reduced to a lower class because they do not need nor want a middle class, and for sure not an upper class. This may sound extreme and scary but it is true. Do your research and you will see.

COLLECTIVISM VS INDIVISUALISM

Choose a side!

[deepsouth]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

actually- I think your dead on with this post. scratch that- I know your dead on with that post

[horsepwr]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

I haven't read Ayn Rand's fiction, but I've read literature based on objectivism, and her work/philosophy. You don't have to know of Ayn Rand to have a clear understanding of individualism and collectivism.
I completely understand the difference of individualism and collectivism. I realize collectivism is where our government is, and is the death of individual liberty. I also recognize my full-on neoconservative right wing libertarian constitutionalist individualist conservative republican stance. The party of which the 2 party system that governs this great nation today that my category fits into is the (R).

[FUZO]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

I THINK EVERYONE NEEDS TO DO THERE RESEARCH AND GET THE WORD OUT THERE.

[straydoglogic]

Re: Anyone notice Paul was back on Beck?

"true Republicans".
Do you ever wonder why a man like Dr. Ron Paul, that knows history like the back of his hand, holds onto that (R)? For some reason, I don't think he's just latched on to it for politics. He doesn't strike me as that guy. I could be wrong. I don't know him personally.

He said exactly why he holds on to the R, and those reasons are that he feels that you have to play the game in order to win. He said that a third party candidate has no real shot at winning, so he runs as a Republican.