Instant Access Registration Takes Less Than 15 Seconds! You May Not Post Until Registered.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble staying logged in when navigating between forums/topics/etc., you need to reset your session cookie. Go into your browser and delete any cookie for the site them log back in. This should fix the login issue.
Disclaimer: Steroid use is illegal in a vast number of countries around the world. This is not without reason. Steroids should only be used when prescribed by your doctor and under close supervision. Steroid use is not to be taken lightly and we do not in any way endorse or approve of illegal drug use. The information is provided on the same basis as all the other information on this site, as informational/entertainment value.
stray,
your name illustrates your way of thinking. my point is that 400 years from now, our "evolved science" will look similar to that of 400 years ago presently. Again, the arrogance of assuming human logic can explain everything is ridiculous. Spock is a television character..LOL.
i know plenty about your religion...before you ridicule my way of thinking i suggest you learn more about it...which is more than 400 years...600bce...
and my name illustrates nothing...for you know not where my names derives from...
and the arrogance of human logic is that we try to find logic..instead of ingnorance and false hope because youre to weak to find answers for yourself so you rely on something less lazy to give the answer to you...
human logic..from the same logic that had the best scientists in the world believing the world was flat, the earth was the center of the universe, that the body had "humors" that had to be balanced to maintain health--all this was considered "science" and "fact"; man's "logic" is only as good as his current status of understanding. How can we know all the answers when we don't even know all the questions? to assume that human logic, understanding, will lead you to truth is the epitome of arrogance...hmm..
Ill go with faith.
Eternity--smoking or non smoking??
No one holds a monopoly on logic - not even the scientist you want to link to it and just because someone is a "scientist" doesn't mean they submit to logical. And to counter your argument; was it logic or faith that resisted the evidence that suggested these beliefs were false? It seems throughout history those that submit to faith resist the truth, even when it has been confirmed.
Your right though logic is not omniscient - we cannot learn about things that we do not know exist but faith does not offer these answers either - it just lets people believe their imaginary world exists. On the plus side logic does not detach one from reality; while faith does.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment