Tweet
First of all, anyone who thinks OBAMA has experience and PALIN has none, is an IDIOT.
let me elaborate -
Palin was a mayor (albeit of a small town) for many years, before being ELECTED governor of her state, and has the experience of being one of the top energy producing states (a critical issue) as well as running a state with a 6 billion dollar annual budget.
OBAMA on the other hand was "elected" to the ILLINOIS state senate in 1996.
And HOW did he do that ? -
He was able to get into the Illinois Senate by challenging the veracity of nominating petitions until his competitors could no longer legally be considered candidates and were knocked off the ballot.
He then decided to run for US congress.
He lost in a landslide to 4 term incumbent Bobby Rush.
Then , with help from President of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones. Obama was able to wiggle his way into a position to run for US Senate.
How? - Jones by his own admissions says "I'm gonna make me a U.S. Senator.'"
When the time came to run for US senate. the other two candidates Blair Hull(D) and Jack Ryan(R) Both got rocked with HUGE scandals in the weeks before the election, forcing both of them to DROP OUT of the race.
Obama basically won be default.
SO-
TWO elections "WON" by default.
AND
Over half his senate votes ending in either "no vote" or "present", instead of standing for or against an issue, he has really proven that HE is the one with ZERO experience.
The fact that he has made it this far, and the liberal media burying his total lack of ANY world or political experience is total bullshit.
Oh the other hand, I think Palin was an outstanding move for McCain.
Obama was really hammering the message of change for Washington, and now that move has been stolen from him.
Obama, and Biden especially, are Washington insiders.
McCain is a maverick, and Palin is an outsider.
THEY are the ones who will bring change.
__________________
I got this from a site
let me elaborate -
Palin was a mayor (albeit of a small town) for many years, before being ELECTED governor of her state, and has the experience of being one of the top energy producing states (a critical issue) as well as running a state with a 6 billion dollar annual budget.
OBAMA on the other hand was "elected" to the ILLINOIS state senate in 1996.
And HOW did he do that ? -
He was able to get into the Illinois Senate by challenging the veracity of nominating petitions until his competitors could no longer legally be considered candidates and were knocked off the ballot.
He then decided to run for US congress.
He lost in a landslide to 4 term incumbent Bobby Rush.
Then , with help from President of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones. Obama was able to wiggle his way into a position to run for US Senate.
How? - Jones by his own admissions says "I'm gonna make me a U.S. Senator.'"
When the time came to run for US senate. the other two candidates Blair Hull(D) and Jack Ryan(R) Both got rocked with HUGE scandals in the weeks before the election, forcing both of them to DROP OUT of the race.
Obama basically won be default.
SO-
TWO elections "WON" by default.
AND
Over half his senate votes ending in either "no vote" or "present", instead of standing for or against an issue, he has really proven that HE is the one with ZERO experience.
The fact that he has made it this far, and the liberal media burying his total lack of ANY world or political experience is total bullshit.
Oh the other hand, I think Palin was an outstanding move for McCain.
Obama was really hammering the message of change for Washington, and now that move has been stolen from him.
Obama, and Biden especially, are Washington insiders.
McCain is a maverick, and Palin is an outsider.
THEY are the ones who will bring change.
__________________
I got this from a site
Comment