Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

[sofargone561]

I know this has been discussed 1000 times but im curious to see what you guys on here think.
Which way gives you the best gains?
which way gives you the most sides?
Which way do you prefer?

One of the arguments that someone on another board made which kind of made sense what that tren is 5 times stronger then test so why not run a small amount of test to get normal body function and what not and higher tren for the anabolic purposes?

Anyway im just curious to see what you guys had to say.

[dirtwarrior]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

I am doing my 1st tren cycle and am doing 500 test and 200 tren. I can post results when the tren kicks in.

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

Let me know. Ill be running tren with sust and EQ in a few months and i am trying to decide whether to go for the old higher test lower tren or the higher tren lower test im not sure. I think im going to stick with the high test low tren for now and maybe next time try it the other way

[Ezskanken]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

I've done Tren 2 times so far. First time Test P was 200mg a week while Tren A was at 400mg a week. This time I doing 250mg Test E a week and 400mg Tren A. Both times were/are amazing, and I loved every second in the gym. I can see why people call it both ways as a lean bulk or cutting compound. I don't plan to even try higher test then Tren honestly. But n the flip side, I've done 2-1 Test E to Deca and loved that too! Don't plan on flipping that one around either ha ha!

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

Well i have ran decca a few times and i run decca slightly lower then my test e and i LOVED IT but ive never ran tren and im going to after my next bulk but im trying to figure out the best way to do it. I was thinking about running sust arounf 500mg a week and tren around 350mg a week but everyone who runs the tren higher seems to like it more

[Ezskanken]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

It is a hard decision, only one you'll find out with time and experimentation of both ways. I'm not to eager to see what the opposite does for me, as I've read the same things you've read about it. And from my experience, what I've read about Test lower then Tren to lower or even completely illuminate sides has been true for me.

[6p6]

Maybe just bro science but I always keep my test higher than tren.

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

hmmm.. what to do, what to do! lol Ive honestly never ran tren and ive always ran test higher then i run everything else so idk what to think here. i think like you said the only way to tell it to just go for it. i think the first time im going to run test higher this time and then next time switch it and then post back in here although it will be months because im going to run a bulk before my cut but i still dnt even have the supplies for my bulk yet lol

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

This is what someone in another forum posted:
"I've run several tren cycles and from my experience high test low tren leads to intense sides and great gains. High tren and low test causes no sides and great gains. So its pretty obvious as to which way I prefer. With high tren low test caber isn't necessary for me. High test low tren caber is a must. So it also saves me from having to buy caber and I can spend that money on more tren lol."

[ZOOT]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

It's all relative to one's own body. If one bro posts his results, they may certainly not yield the same results for someone else...as we all know. For me, higher test is the way. For a first run I would run low tren, get that liver checked and make decisions from there for future runs. Tren is very hepatoxic and not to be taken lightly. Then there are the sides. For me, higher test keeps sides at a minimum, they are still there but not as bad as if I ran tren higher. Experiment safely my brutha.

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

Thanks for the post brother im so lost on what to do lol i think im going to keep it test higher and see how it goes idk. if the sides suck im going to bear it and deal with it and hopefully next time it will be better. i hope the sides arent to bad though. i should be ok. im going to find out though lol

[bionic redneck]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

i agree with 6p6.. i always run my test even or at least 100mg higher but everyone is differant

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

Thanks fellas! i love the feedback here. I trust most of your guys! im going to be running tren A at around 300mg EW to start and sust around 500mg EW to start and see how sides are from there

[DaMaster]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

.

Odd enough because to me... logically speaking... if the sides are from tren, then dosing higher would mean more sides. Dosing low would mean less sides - plus, if it;s true that tren is 5x stronger anabolically speaking, then I would need less per dose.

[sofargone561]

Re: Low test, high tren VS low tren high Test debate

thats what i was thinking^ not to mention what was stated above tren is a lot more toxic then test. and i have to take in to account the other compounds i will be running so i need to keep my self safe and will be running tren lower