Did Armstrong Drug Use Give Him Cancer?

[BABY1]

Newser) – So Lance Armstrong probably cheated to battle back from his cancer diagnosis in 1996—that only leveled the playing field with other cyclists. But what if steroid use gave him that cancer in the first place? "I don’t think any part of his public reputation would survive if it turns out that his disease itself was a product of pre-comeback doping," writes Shayana Kadidal at Global Post. And it's quite possible, she argues: Steroids and human growth hormone are known to cause cancer. Steroid-using ballplayer Jeremy Giambi, for example, got a rare kind of pituitary cancer that's been seen in weightlifters on 'roids. But after Armstrong's return to cycling, he would have used blood transfusions and safer PEDs that don't cause cancer. "It raises what I think is really the most important question in Armstrong’s case," writes Kadidal. "Did abuse of the steroid drugs whose use was rampant in cycling in the 1980s and early 1990s cause the cancer that ultimately made Armstrong into a global celebrity, and into an heroic figure in the eyes of the global cancer community?"

[Dzone]

Re: Did Armstrong Drug Use Give Him Cancer?

I would say its hogwash

[ZOOT]

Re: Did Armstrong Drug Use Give Him Cancer?

Everything causes cancer..Some are more apt to get it because of family history and doing certain things may help it along...imo

[6p6]

They hv also proven the dam seats they ride endless hours cause massive issues for guys in that general region...