Prop/winny or prop/eq cycle?

[jman20]

Alright boys here's the deal. I'm running on a tight budget right now and am having a difficult time deciding between these two cycles:

Cycle 1
test prop 100mg eod wks 1-10
eq 500mg/wk wks 1-10
.25mg l-dex eod

or

Cycle 2
prop 100mg eod wks 1-10
winny 50mg ed wks 5-10
.25mg l-dex eod

I'd run all three but like I said money is an issue right now. My goals are to add 10-12 pnds lbm and stay as lean as possible. I'm 22, 5'11" 196lbs 5.5%bf, 3rd cycle(1st was eq only, 2nd eq/winny) Let me know what you guys think.

[CJWolf]

i like the test/winny option ...

[VveTTe917]

prop/winny with fina IMO. And add EQ, go nuts Thats what Im on, all 4.

[Pheedno]

If your going with prop, I would go with winny.

If you like EQ, I would use a longer acting test like Cyp or Enan

[prolangtum]

#1, drop the liquidex

[bronco21]

First off let me say that I am jealous of VveTTe917 b/c that sounds like the shit, but I am in between cycles right now. Out of your two options I would go with the later, but they are both good stacks for someone pretty new to the game. Good luck.

[jman20]

Thanks guys, I'm leaning towards the prop/winny.

[prolangtum]

Honestly, on a tight budget, or any budget for that matter, ldex is not needed unless you are very gyno prone on 100mg eod of prop. Save yourself some cash, and have just a little nolva on hand.

[jman20]

I know it's dependent on the individual but how much water do you suppose a guy would retain on 100mg prop eod?

[prolangtum]

I retain the least water of all Tests, when i run prop. Ethanate, Cypionate, and Suspension alol mek me hold roughly the same. You can barely tell im "on" if running prop.

[rado]

Originally posted by prolangtum
#1, drop the liquidex

WHY? Itll keep the bloat off him.

[rado]

Originally posted by prolangtum
I retain the least water of all Tests, when i run prop. Ethanate, Cypionate, and Suspension alol mek me hold roughly the same. You can barely tell im "on" if running prop.

but that's you, he's diiferent. he might not react the way you do to this kind of gear...

[prolangtum]

but prop causes very little water retention in 90%, plus i think it is not needed unless over 750mgs, and it is overall detrimental to chloresterol and your cardivascualr system, not to mention its potential to lower igf-1

[Impossible]

350mgs/wk of prop will hold almost zero water, no need for the adex.

[rado]

Originally posted by prolangtum
but prop causes very little water retention in 90%, plus i think it is not needed unless over 750mgs, and it is overall detrimental to chloresterol and your cardivascualr system, not to mention its potential to lower igf-1

your about as stubborn as a donkey's ass kid, not to mention myself as well. :withstupi :withstupi :withstupi