Question for the skilled ones!!

[iamhuge]

I have a question that might seem really basic….but here goes…

I am just finishing 12 weeks of 700mg test E and 500 EQ per week..

Weeks 1-6 front loaded with 100mg EOD of test P..

Weeks 7-12 ending with 80 mg ED of tren acetate…

Here is my question…….I have several weeks of tren left over, would it benefit me to keep the tren going alone for 3-4 weeks while cutting the fat off THEN hit it hard with the PCT.

I know that tren alone will mess with the head, and the emotions will roller coaster, but will it benefit or hamper my cycle?

THANKS ALL!

[FUZO]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

save it for your next cycle start pct

[daved150]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

save it for your next cycle start pct

i concur

[iamhuge]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

OK - Thanks!!!!

[jamescb77]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

i agree not only that but you front loaded for way to long. also you aren't really getting the benefits of eq in 12 weeks

[FUZO]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

You need to run EQ 20+ week I like to run it 6-7-8 months

[iamhuge]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

You need to run EQ 20+ week I like to run it 6-7-8 months

Well damn. Wish I had known that. When you run it for that amount of time - what do you stack (if anything) with it? I was always taught to do 12 week cycles for all around safety and health...

[jamescb77]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

you are correct a 12 week cycle is very safe and good fr health. EQ neds to be used for much longer and that's why it's not recommended for beginners.

[skinnyman]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

i agree not only that but you front loaded for way to long. also you aren't really getting the benefits of eq in 12 weeks

Interesting. How long do you recommend frontloading prior to hitting the tren?

[jamescb77]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

i don't recomend ever front loading. I think it's a waste and causes uneven blood levels. if your going to run tren ace i recomend running test prop with it and starting them bth together.

[Septu]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

i prefer to run the test a few weeks longer than the tren. seems to make recovery easier.

[FUZO]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

Well damn. Wish I had known that. When you run it for that amount of time - what do you stack (if anything) with it? I was always taught to do 12 week cycles for all around safety and health...

I stack my EQ with prop. I never come off though. And I get blood work every 3 months

[horsepwr]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

Well damn. Wish I had known that. When you run it for that amount of time - what do you stack (if anything) with it? I was always taught to do 12 week cycles for all around safety and health...

I do not come off. That running 12weekers...that on & off-pct...on & off-pct...etc...is unhealthy. Running for 6-8 months does no harm to the body what-so-ever. So to answer your question; run test with the EQ.

And I have blood work to back up my statements, and I bet that that roller coaster of on & off bs is so hard on the body. hormonally & mentally. Just run a good cycle out. and come off for a few months. If that's what you wanna do.

[iamhuge]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

OK – seriously, I’m not arguing, I guess I’m still old school. I date back to the old a.com days.

What about all that “the receptors will become saturated and not respond very much” if a cycle goes for more a couple of months.

We were taught if you go off cycle for the same amount of weeks, then back on, the receptors would “reset” and you would actually gain more than staying on for the duration?

Is this old info and to be ignored now?

THANKS!!!!!

[horsepwr]

Re: Question for the skilled ones!!

OK – seriously, I’m not arguing, I guess I’m still old school. I date back to the old a.com days.

What about all that “the receptors will become saturated and not respond very much” if a cycle goes for more a couple of months.

We were taught if you go off cycle for the same amount of weeks, then back on, the receptors would “reset” and you would actually gain more than staying on for the duration?

Is this old info and to be ignored now?

THANKS!!!!!

That receptor rule does stand true to a degree. Receptors do get used. I wouldn't use the term "saturated". For one thing, no-one has proven that new receptors aren't produced when needed. Another thing is there are so many receptors. Different receptors for different molecules and molecular structures. Once a receptor receives it's molecule, that receptor moves it along and a new receptor is ready for another, such as a hormone, as we're talking about. I personally don't believe staturation of receptors is possible. If that were so, your body would stop responding to the hormones given. That doesn't happen. A doctor might prescibe testosterone for the rest of your life. Would he do that if it would not be effective but for a few months? of course not. Nor would your body respond to that testosterone for life if receptors could become "saturated" with the hormone.
So in conclusion. Receptor saturation would be not only no worry to me what-so-ever, but I would probably never let that thought cross my mind again. It just doesn't happen. Your body will respond to whatever hormone given for however long it is given.