Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Albuterol

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Albuterol

    Them being both beta 2 does not make them the same is all. THey act differently, test results show them having different effects aside from the half life, and their chemical makeup is different.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Albuterol

      To say they are the same chemical is incorrect First (you are correct in them being both beta 2 though), but they do have similarities in effect. Geesler is right Albuterol is a Sulfate. Iam taking Albuterol right now, and i must say that the albuterol is milder, but if you take enough of it you will get similar effects as with the clen. Iam prefering the albuterol, because it doesn't interfere with my sleep. Oh, and another plus is it has shown that it actually lowers the LDL cholesterol levels and doesn't have the adverse effects on the heart as does clenbuterol.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Albuterol

        Originally posted by geesler
        test results show them having different effects aside from the half life, and their chemical makeup is different.
        I'm not trying to fight here, maybe i'm out of the loop? Waht HUMAN study has been done on Clenbuterol?
        A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. -Thomas Jefferson

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Albuterol

          No worries bro- not trying to fight either- just discussing
          Here:

          pdf:http://www.vetlearn.com/images/VTX-H...20Dirikolu.pdf
          html:http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache...lenbuterol.pdf

          Effect of clenbuterol on athletic performance
          Unlike inhaled beta 2-agonists, more studies need to be performed before the action of systemic beta 2-agonists on athletic performance can be assessed accurately. Experiments in animals with oral clenbuterol have shown augmentation in muscle bulk across numerous species, but human studies cannot co …
          Last edited by geesler; 08-01-2005, 09:24 PM.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Albuterol

            Originally posted by firstenrgy
            Th ONLY difference is the half-life. Clen was never approved for human use (and was applied for by drug companies) because of its long half-life. Not a flame syr, thers just so much mis-info out there.
            Dont worry: we're all here to learn.
            I have yet to find studies of clen done on humans, and also anecdotal feedback on people who used BOTH drugs is scarce at best. Mostly because the ones who choose to take Albuterol does that for safety reasons and would never take Clen. On the contrary someone who used clenbuterol successfully could try Alb and make some comparison. I bet they wil with time. As a research chem (with effective dosages) Albuterol is a rather new drug in the scene.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Albuterol

              Originally posted by geesler
              No worries bro- not trying to fight either- just discussing
              Here:
              The first and third study confirm the fact that areosol administrations use such low doses of alb/clen to not have impact on lipolisis and/or athletic performance.
              The second one is very interesting to warn about the side effects of a *long term* use of Clen, altough in rats. From the anectodal feedback i've read, long term is anything above 6 weeks AND without using means to clear the receptors (benadryl or ketotifen protocols).

              Comment

              Working...
              X