How long of a cycle do you prefer?

[djflex]

Re: How long of a cycle do you prefer?

I wouldn't be on longer than 16 weeks. Your cell receptor sites will no longer be open to taking in much more. Not that you won't continue to see results, but side effects become much more prominent, and you will find that you won't be seeing the same effects as you did in the earlier weeks. Give you body a chance to take some time off and return back to normal levels, and you will see the same surge you saw at the beginning of the cycle.

Good luck,
fimgym

[AlmostThere]

Re: How long of a cycle do you prefer?

I wouldn't be on longer than 16 weeks. Your cell receptor sites will no longer be open to taking in much more. Not that you won't continue to see results, but side effects become much more prominent, and you will find that you won't be seeing the same effects as you did in the earlier weeks. Give you body a chance to take some time off and return back to normal levels, and you will see the same surge you saw at the beginning of the cycle.

Good luck,
fimgym

I was under the impression that the longer you were on the more AAS receptors there are. Site downgrade is a common myth when it comes to AAS. You are right that the progress slows but it you will keep growing only a little slower then before. I personally dont find the sides get any worse i actually find the longer i am on the less pronounced the sides become.

The surge you are talking about is part of the yoyo affect that i and crank both mentioned . You put it on fast and then whether you want to admit it or not you lose quite a bit at the end.

The debate continues.

[DragonRider]

Re: How long of a cycle do you prefer?

I was under the impression that the longer you were on the more AAS receptors there are. Site downgrade is a common myth when it comes to AAS.
The debate continues.

Amen. I'm glad you pointed that myth out.

I am also a big believer in the blast and cruise method.