Question on finaplix pellets

[sixlitre]

What is the legal standing on possesion of finaplix pellets? Just want to know before I considering ordering. Thanks

[BM]

Re: Question on finaplix pellets

They are still legal to purchase and to have in possesion. Legality issues start as Crank stated only once you begin to alter them from their original state. You will find now on many websites that they require a vet script to order or you have to provide proof that you do own bovine. Just keep searching on google as there are still plenty that don't ask any questions and will just send you the pellets.

[sixlitre]

Re: Question on finaplix pellets

Thanks guys.

[mcbvr6]

Re: Question on finaplix pellets

It isn't just once you convert them that they become illegal. It starts as soon as the state can prove that you intended to use them for human consumption. Essentially, if they catch a bodybuilder with a stack of pellets and no cows, they can prosecute you.

[mcbvr6]

Re: Question on finaplix pellets

They may be able to prosecute you.... but good luck trying to prove that you were going to use the pellets to make tren and use it.... The point is it is not against the law to have those pellets... What your trying to say is they could charge you based on an assumption.... Thats like saying if they find bullets in my house and I don't have a gun, then they can prosecute me based on the fact that I might take the gun powder out of the bullets and make a bomb.... See what I am getting at?

I see what you are getting at, and am certainly not saying that it would be the easiest case to ever fall through the DA's door. The problem is this, Trenbolone is a Schedule III drug. However, there is an exemption from prosecution for those in possession of it as long as it remains "intended for nonhuman use." In other words it isn't the act of converting it that costs you the exemption, it is the intent that the product be used by a human.

Further, because it is a scheduled drug with a limited exemption based upon the intent of the person to be charged, it would be up to the person charged to prove the exception covered his or her possession. Essentially, if you have the drug they can charge you and unless you can prove that it was intended for nonhuman (in the case of finaplix - cattle) consumption then you are in violation of the CSA.

I'm not suggesting that anyone is out looking to presecute people for implant possession. But the original question was whether possession was legal. My point is simply that if you have a cattle ranch possession is probably legal. But, if you are bodybuilder in NYC who gets busted with some test, equipoise, needles, and Finaplix pellets, you can bet that you will be charged for the Finaplix. Everyone else falls somewhere inbetween depending upon the individual circumstances - but it isn't just a matter of whether or not the pellets have been converted.