EQ is not effective at 8 weeks now?

[Equalizer]

I made a post to a guy that didnt wanna do a long cycle(8 weeks) and suggested running equipoise for only 8 weeks and then i was questioned about whether i had ever used it or more less told i didnt know what i was talking about...i would like to hear some opinions on this, YEA YOU CAN RUN IT LONGER AND STILL BE GAINING but to say its not effective at 8 weeks is ridiculous???? come on,know what you are talking about.....i might be new to this board but ive been around for awhile and its frustrating when one person who thinks they are the steroid authority questions anothers advice when it is perfectly sound advice.

[doberman7]

effective @8 weeks yes. but twice as good at 12. i gues sthey say that cuz it takes so long to kick in. and at 8 weeks your only getting like 4 good weeks of gains

[Equalizer]

Just so u know i always run eq at least 3 months cuzz i dont ever do a cycle less then that so im aware of the effects of it but i just wanted it to be known that eq is effective at 8 weeks and one shouldnt be questioned for saying that.

[DOUBLE J]

I find EQ very mild and a long ester. The actions that it is known for take awhile to develope. Strong androgens will show benefits within 8 wks. EQ is not a strong androgen.

EQ is known for solid slow keepable gains, vascularity,ect. These tend to require more time.

8 wks noticable? Yes. But 12 wks make quite a difference.

[Gymratforlife]

not worth taking for 8 weeks I know from my own mistakes.

[Double]

if there was another boldenone ester than we wouldn't be having this discussion. eq is good shit but it takes too long to kick in which i hate. if they had an eq that was fast acting like the phenylpropionate ester for nandralone so u don't have to take the decanoate ester, i would always include boldenone in every cycle (which i kinda do anyways)

[Double]

if i ever become a chemist i'm gonna research on boldenone and try to make a new ester for it.

[71olds442]

youve already been beat to that double... there are boldenone acetate powders and boldenone base powders that are attainable...

[71olds442]

Originally posted by doberman7
effective @8 weeks yes. but twice as good at 12. i gues sthey say that cuz it takes so long to kick in. and at 8 weeks your only getting like 4 good weeks of gains

you are forgetting that you will still have very elevated levels for a few weeks after you stop... ive run it for 10 wks on a few cycles... some people say no less than 15wks or so.. thats crap IMO. the ester isnt all that much longer than cypionate and people dont say to take that for over 12-14wks...

[FUZO]

I'LL BE RUNNING EQ FOR 14 WEEKS.I'M AT WEEK 10 AND NOW I REALY SEE RESULTS

[mick-G]

I ran EQ for 13wks and didn't start noticing anything until wk 7-8. So if you run it for only 8 wks and stop, you will not get the benefit of the boldenone. I would say to at least take it for 12wk. I prefer 14wks. and they do make a fast acting EQ with acetate.

[Double]

damn it...why doesn't anyone sell this already made? maybe i should take up chemistry, bcuz i don't see this on any of my sources' list

[71olds442]

acetate... not acetone. its the same ester as the "fina" you get from the cartridges. so if you wont do eq for under 12-14 wks... how long would you recomend sust?? 20+?

[Equalizer]

im aware of the esters and logic of running it longer which i do myself but im just stating ITS NOT USELESS TO ONLY RUN IT 8 WEEKS.....

[mick-G]

What I'm sayin is that for myself i don't start seeing results with EQ till the 7th or 8th wk of use. Some people start seeing results alitte earlier. So, if you are the same, then you are going to be cutting it off just as you start to see results, thats why most use it for a longer period. It to me would be a waste of aas to use for such a short cycle, IMO. I think i would be better to use the deca with the test if you want to have a shorter cycle.