Underdosed Gear and Your Source

[jack hust]

Originally posted by nmk85roll
I believe the underdosing was published in the new Anabolics 2004. That's at least where i got the idea from.

And no, you shouldn't pay the source if they amps are overdosed. Now, as it was stated before, if he sent me 60 amps instead of 30, I would definately either send the extra back or pay for it. Because THAT's good, honest business.

Anyway, I think this is one of the best discussions I have seen on this board in a long time. Lets get some more opinions!

well if will from ana 2004 said it i would not even take it as a fact he is not very good at what he does imo

[trip]

You stated, summarizing here, "Reports have come out dosed at 180 mg's" .

In reality that information is no better than a "rumor" it is not factual in nature, because it is was not specifically your gear that was tested.

If it was me and the source was as great as you say, I would do nothing to upset him whatsoever cause information, ie, "rumor" is very suspect. In reality what could he do.

My other thought is always, greatest chance of getting busted is doing the deal, and if that is successfull, unless major problems, never ever go back to the scene of the crime, ie make contact for any reason. Way to risky.

Again, just me.

[mcbvr6]

Originally posted by jack hust
well if will from ana 2004 said it i would not even take it as a fact he is not very good at what he does imo

That is a fact. Llewellyn thinks he knows everything about everything. Was it just WL saying ICNs are underdosed blah blah blah - or did he even bother to publish the lab report. If no lab report, its just him bagging on another brand of gear. Even with a report I would be suspect if it was from WL. That guy seems to put as much false information out there as anyone in the industry.

[MYRICK]

YEAH HE BLOWS

[jsjs24]

Originally posted by jack hust
i dont think you do the source has no way of knowing or being responsible for a amp being underdose that is the risk of the buyer imo , if you ask him and he says no i would not hold that agint him or her

Right on Jack...it's not the sources fault.

[Skarn]

No way is the source responsible for the dosing of another labs gear! He's only the "delivery man". Like Jack said, you order ICNs, you get ICNs, period. Same with any other brand. You order and get what you order is the sources only responsibility.

Hard to believe people actually said the source was responsible for underdosed gear of other brands.

Skarn