Tweet
To anyone who's used EQ, what are some opinions on frontloading this stuff for the first couple/few weeks to get it working a little sooner (QV EQ)?
Waste of time?
Make sence?
Thank you....
Waste of time?
Make sence?
Thank you....
-
-
Are you using only eq???
If so - just double the dose for the first week.
NauticaDisclaimer:
Nautica is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way, shape or form use, encourage, nor condone the use of any illegal substances or the use of legal substances in an illegal manner. The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
www.spotinjections.com -
Originally posted by nautica
Are you using only eq???
If so - just double the dose for the first week.
Nautica
Yeah, I should have mentioned.....I'll be using it with qv enanthate (500mg per wk of that). I'm planning on 2 shots a wk of each product.
I'm planning on making it a 10wk minimum cycle (I may add a third bottle of EQ when I get deep into the cycle to lengthen it to 12-14 or so if I feel it'll add more size/benefits).
This will be about my 6th or 7th cycle, but I've never had EQ before (only tests and deca before).
(I also have Nolvadex)Comment
-
I'm not a big fan of frontloading. I would however run eq for as long as you can. It takes awhile for eq to kick in and the results are moderate when they do appear. If you can afford it, I'd recommend taking it for longer than the 10 weeks you have planned.My only email is
txlonghorn@elitefitness.comComment
-
I just started my third week of a test eq cycle and I did not front load either. I thought about it but just decided to run it for 16 weeks.Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups
Comment
-
There is no science to back up frontloading with oilbased AAS.Originally posted by TxLonghorn
I'm not a big fan of frontloading. I would however run eq for as long as you can. It takes awhile for eq to kick in and the results are moderate when they do appear. If you can afford it, I'd recommend taking it for longer than the 10 weeks you have planned.
It took me 6 weeks to notice the effects from EQ, so i think longer cycles are called for.Comment
-
yeh, I only frontload test products. Never really thought of doing it with EQ. I like running EQ for a long time.....rather then frontloading it.RIP - Geared
RIP - BigJ
flexer01@cyber-rights.netComment
-
I beg to differ my friend. Prop and oil based suspension worked well when I frontload oil based AAS. I also frontloaded with Eq, 1200mg the first two weeks and by the time it completely hit my system gyno related lumps were already evident and it was too late to remedy it even though I was taking 20mg of nolva each day. It wasn't enough. But I do agree that when it comes to Eq it's better to go with a longer cycle.Originally posted by DragonRider
There is no science to back up frontloading with oilbased AAS.
It took me 6 weeks to notice the effects from EQ, so i think longer cycles are called for.Comment
-
I should have clarified; oil based AAS with long esters.Originally posted by iamdwalrus
I beg to differ my friend. Prop and oil based suspension worked well when I frontload oil based AAS.
Prop and suspension would work because they have an immediate effect.Comment
-
I would just use the eq that you have planned to frontload with to extend the cycle, although it probably won't hurt you to frontload, i dont think it will help that much either. If this is your first time with EQ just do the standard thing and dont frontload, then next time you use it, you can experiment some to see if you notice the difference.in_trouble@cyber-rights.netComment
-
Originally posted by DragonRider
I should have clarified; oil based AAS with long esters.
Prop and suspension would work because they have an immediate effect.
A) So generally, frontloading works better with short ester gear....and not so with long esters? If so, then it doesn't seem like there would be any point to frontload something that works fast already.
B) Or is it simply a debate/opinion that frontloading does good with any gear at all?
Thanks everybody for all the comments and thoughts so far......
(several yrs ago I used to be told that pyramiding was the way to do things, so I'm still getting used to all these modern techniques and tricks
)
Comment
-
To answer your question(s)Originally posted by blkturbo
A) So generally, frontloading works better with short ester gear....and not so with long esters? If so, then it doesn't seem like there would be any point to frontload something that works fast already.
B) Or is it simply a debate/opinion that frontloading does good with any gear at all?
Thanks everybody for all the comments and thoughts so far......
(several yrs ago I used to be told that pyramiding was the way to do things, so I'm still getting used to all these modern techniques and tricks )
A. The point of frontloading with short esters is so that we can saturate the receptors and fill each and everyone of them until the long esters kick in(with the exception of Trenbolone acetate IMO, long esters are more conducive to LBM gains than fast acting esters).
B. The jury is still out whether it's good to frontload with any gear at all. I've frontloaded primo, masteron and I didn't see the point of doing it again since the results were abyssmal.
Comment
-
i dont front load but you do need to run your eq longer than 10 weeks 14 min imhoComment
Comment