Tweet
Ok, fact is, you CAN inject slin into muscles, it just changes the pharmakinetics. I believe the slin needle is about the right length for a bicep injection. A person could do 5 I.U. in each bicep after a serious bicep workout. My theory for this is that it is recommended to rotate injection spots with slin in the stomach so that there is not a tissue buildup (of fat). Couldn't this same principle be used for biceps, i.e., more slin is delivered to where it is injected. Any thoughts?? Anyone willing to try?? I would but don't want to guinea pig when I've never used Slin.
-
-
Re: Slin in Biceps
This doesn't really make sense to me. I am by no means a slin expert, but 5iu's is a very small about of liquid. Also, injecting it IM makes the slin much more unmanageable. I was told to stay away from this method. If you decide to try it keep us posted though.Originally posted by AnotherUser
Ok, fact is, you CAN inject slin into muscles, it just changes the pharmakinetics. I believe the slin needle is about the right length for a bicep injection. A person could do 5 I.U. in each bicep after a serious bicep workout. My theory for this is that it is recommended to rotate injection spots with slin in the stomach so that there is not a tissue buildup (of fat). Couldn't this same principle be used for biceps, i.e., more slin is delivered to where it is injected. Any thoughts?? Anyone willing to try?? I would but don't want to guinea pig when I've never used Slin.Thate -
slin should not be used im ,please dont try this or slin for that matter if you do not understand slin it selfComment
-
No IM, because if you inject it into the muscles then it's unpredictable when the slin will spike and that could be dangerous.Comment
-
and also...slin is not localized like that. Meaning...just because you inject in your bis doesn't mean your bis will get more storage of nutrients. Always inject in fat, not muscle.http://photos.yahoo.com/mi_hardbody
I had over 5000 posts at fitnessboard.com before it died. May its spirit live on here!
I'm also a mod@suckmypeepee.com.Comment
-
Subcuteneous only bro.Comment
-
avoid slin period!!!!!!!!!!!Comment
-
the bad thing about shooting slin in a muscle is if you hit a vein...... your gonna go hypo as hell.
and dont think 'oh ill just aspirate'
you move the needle 1/8 of an inch after apirating and you can be in a vein. theres also other ways the slin can get into your direct bloodstream from a IM inj.
ive done it before a few times and i didnt feel it kicked in much faster anyway, so illl never do it again, theres simply way to much risk, and close to zero benefit.Comment
-
agreed, no benefits in on-sites w/slin..I heard gh but not slin.Originally posted by BossMann
Subcuteneous only bro.
sub-q it!Comment
-
Billy Bathgate posted somewhere, maybe it was steroidology, that the absorbtion and peak is not as fast IM as it is sub Q, which goes against what you would think, it provides no local growth. If you are worried about fat build up, do what i do, use the fat in the upper part of you legs about 3 inches down from your crotchComment
-
Ol Billy Boy know his science facts, I always knew and was told sub-q is best but he has the info's..
he forgot to add HCG to list so I improved it lol quote Billy B:
IM muscular injections of fast acting water based products such as GH, HCG, Slin, Vit B-12, etc have an absorbtion rate of 57% verses Sub-Q which is 69%.
That would conclude IM would take longer to be fully absorbed, which would change the shape of the peak by lowering and extending it.
I read that in my PDR last night. Thought Id share. I would have suspected IM to be absorbed faster than SubQ.Comment
Comment