One of the top 10 finishers in this years Master's Mr. Olympia claims to be natural and to have never used AAS in his life. Does anyone believe this to be likely or even possible?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"Natural" Pro's
Collapse
X
-
Nice oxy-moron...lolA lot of people dream of having a great body, others stay awake and get it done.
All of the Statements made by Mr. Mike_XXL are purely fictional and have absolutely no merit and are not meant to cure, prevent or diagnose any disease, please consult your Physician before starting any exercise and supplement regiment.
Comment
-
Yeah, all these guys that compete in natural show like the musclemania claim to be natural. They might not be taking test or deca, but you can bet your ass they are hitting insulin and GH as hard as a regular pro. There is no test that can detect insulin of GH use.
Comment
-
re: natural contests
Most natural contests are drug tested ie. epitestosterone/test ratio as well as polygraph or some sort of voice analysis. These tests are inconclusive to say the least. I have personally beaten the voice analysis/poly test. The epi/test ratio is easily beaten as well...most guys doing the musclemania or other natural shows will run tren and prop together until 4 weeks out than switch to winny and primo with t3+clen for fat loss+hcg+nolvadex to normalize ...this brings your ratios back in line and you will test clean! There is no test for testosterone at the moment besides a epi/test ratio exam..but the metabolit itself cannot be distinguised from the natural molecule! There is now a test for HGH but it will not hit the IOC stage probably until 2005 due to political issues. IGF1 R3 would be the way to go since it is much faster in and out and a test has not been developed yet that I know of..any input here would be appreciated! From what I have seen a 4-6 weeks cycle of 60-80 mcg IGF1 R3 long combined with a good AAS would yield a minimum of 10 lbs lean muscle gain plus 4-5 % body fat loss...these are averages I have gathered over much research on "test" subjects!
Peace,
P"Do or Do not, there is no Try!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity!"
Comment
-
Re: re: natural contests
Originally posted by Praetorian
Most natural contests are drug tested ie. epitestosterone/test ratio as well as polygraph or some sort of voice analysis. These tests are inconclusive to say the least. I have personally beaten the voice analysis/poly test. The epi/test ratio is easily beaten as well...most guys doing the musclemania or other natural shows will run tren and prop together until 4 weeks out than switch to winny and primo with t3+clen for fat loss+hcg+nolvadex to normalize ...this brings your ratios back in line and you will test clean! There is no test for testosterone at the moment besides a epi/test ratio exam..but the metabolit itself cannot be distinguised from the natural molecule! There is now a test for HGH but it will not hit the IOC stage probably until 2005 due to political issues. IGF1 R3 would be the way to go since it is much faster in and out and a test has not been developed yet that I know of..any input here would be appreciated! From what I have seen a 4-6 weeks cycle of 60-80 mcg IGF1 R3 long combined with a good AAS would yield a minimum of 10 lbs lean muscle gain plus 4-5 % body fat loss...these are averages I have gathered over much research on "test" subjects!
Peace,
P
is there a test for hgh now????
there is a test for synthetic test now. there is 1 carbon atom difference ior some shit in it. I dont know the exact details of it but i read a huge article on testing and it said there was now offically a test for it."Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas."
- Joseph Stalin
Power perceived is power achieved.
Unless you are the lead dog, the view never changes.
Comment
-
Re: "Natural" Pro's
Originally posted by darmadoc
One of the top 10 finishers in this years Master's Mr. Olympia claims to be natural and to have never used AAS in his life. Does anyone believe this to be likely or even possible?
I find that very hard to believe.
Comment
Comment