Therory question...bored

[DOUBLE J]

This is just a thought about pre-loading and possibly decreasing the time for some esters to inter the blood stream early in a cycle.
EX. If the intention was to use 1200mg of Test ethan(alot I know) a/wk for 12 weeks and the general concenses being about 4 wks to really start to come on....I can see were pre-loading can help.
My thought is that since the mass of the injection takes time to desolve in to the blood stream due to the esther I would imagine it would do this from the outside edge>in intill full disolved,OK?
Absorbtion=outside area of esther exposed(basically).
Question: would not 3 400mg injections done at different locations at the same time give you both a larger exposed area of test ester and areas handling less mass= faster and more effective absorbtion?
Granted this would mostly be for the loading phase.
Thoughts??? Or I could I just be touching myself to often. DJ

[DOUBLE J]

^

[prolangtum]

Frontloading is a way to quicken the so called quick, but injecting in 3 different areas at the same time will not affect the release of 1200mg of cyp. After 10-14 days you have approximatley 600mg of cyp left (ie the Half-life) 3 seperate locations would have 200mg each left, still totaling 600mgs.

[DOUBLE J]

That makes good(normal) sense. I was questioning the total volume of exposed ester. In otherwords...I think of the absorption as a beach ball from the outside in. Would not 3 smaller "balls" still have greater outside exposer. Like gettin` to the center of a tootsie pop drop. : )
Also I had though that the absorbtion would be slightly more effective dealing with a smaller mass and different avenues of travel.
If it is being absorbed equally from the inside of the "ball" of test then this wound`nt make any sense. If I was`nt gettin` too old to remember my math I`d like to be able to figue if the exposed area is larger with3x1?
This is only a thought that I cannot and would`nt argue. Just wanted to shoot this arrow in the air and see where it fell. DJ

[prolangtum]

I see what your saying, and it probaly has some merit, but wether it would make a noticeable difference, i doubt it, but then again i dont know.

[tyron14]

I was thinking about the same thing (was bored too). My unfounded theory is the juice spread in the tissue like a cloud instead of forming a ball. This explains why massaging reduces the sore (cloud is spreaded wider and thinner, less concentrated and less irritating), and why 3 smaller shots don't seem to kick in faster than 1 big shot (not sure about this as I only have 2 cycles so far. There are too many outside variables).

I was thinking of doing an experiment:

1. Get a 4-lb pot roat, bring it up to room tempture.

2. Inject 3 cc of cooking oil. Mark the injection site.

3. Refreeze the pot roast to solidify the tissue.

4. Do a biopsy on the frozen pot roast. See how the oil is stored in it.

5. When done, dispose the sample by cooking it in your favorite fashion.

Will try it next time when I cook.

[BiggerStronger]

Sorry bro but your experiment wont work like it would in the human body. Unfortunately you'll have to do it on a live specimen to see how it moves through moving/contracting/relaxing muscle. lol.