EQ or deca

[Dr Gonzo]

I recently read that EQ was more anabolic and less androgenic, is this true and would it be better to use for a first cycle with d-bol and test ? Any input helpful

[Aragorn]

What are your goals for the cycle? It depends on what those are when choosing.

Aragorn

[manny78]

What's your goal ? A cutting cycle or a mass cycle ?

[jack hust]

eq and dbol would be a great first cycle

[Dr Gonzo]

looking to put on mass but want to keep all of my gains

[Small]

Personally, I don't believe that EQ is more anabolic then Deca. I think it's slightly less anabolic and slightly more androgenic.
But, that's just my opinion.
I would suggest using Deca for bulking if you want more mass, and don't care about slight bloat, and EQ for cutting, or bulking if you want to keep it as lean as possible.

[GSU7]

Originally posted by Small
Personally, I don't believe that EQ is more anabolic then Deca. I think it's slightly less anabolic and slightly more androgenic.
But, that's just my opinion.
I would suggest using Deca for bulking if you want more mass, and don't care about slight bloat, and EQ for cutting, or bulking if you want to keep it as lean as possible.

I agree w/Small here, i think for your goals deca would definitely be the way to go..

[Hellrzr33]

Love deca for bulking and eq for the cut cycles!!!

[rescued]

I hold more water when on Deca, but that is with a Test base, which I assume you are going to do. IMO, all cycles should have a test base of some sort. EQ will lean you out more than Deca, especially if you are able to control your appetite. EQ will make you hungrier than hell. Muscle hardness is better with EQ too.

[pigmeat]

test-deca and jump start with d-bol. That,in my oppinion, is THE best bulking cycle.