two 9 week cycles or one 16-18 weeks?

[MrRTTB]

after the summer I first thought I would do a longer cycle, something like 18 weeks on. Now, I havn't decided if I really should run it for 18 weeks or if it would be better to run 2 9 week cycles instead.

The first one would look like this

1-9 Deca 300mg per week 600mg first week
1-9 Test Enathate 500mg every week, front with 1g
1-3: Test prop 100mg EOD
7-10: winny 50mg ED
arimidex 1mg ED
proviron for SHBG 25mg ED

second:

Everything as above but instead of ending with Winny I will start first 4 weeks with Dbol at 35mg ED and not use Prop.

Or should you combine them and run it for a longer period, if so why?

[scorpion]

I would go with 2 cycles of 9 weeks....reasons

(1) receptors
(2) Natural test levels will come back to normal faster
(3) will see better results/gains with 2 cycles
(4) less chance of side-effects

I could think of more but im tired....these are just opinions though

[Juicemonkey101]

I'm a big fan of longer cycles with moderate doses.... But considering your doses are pretty moderate, its up too you. I wouldnt recomended running Deca 18 weeks, maybe switch up Deca to EQ after week 9 if you choose to run it 18 weeks.

[Wartime100]

I would go with on longer cycle. I seem to put on more quality muscle gains with longer cycles. I would take some hcg for a few weeks during the cycle.

[Massive1]

IMO it depends on what you intend to accomplish.
I prefer longer cycles,mainly because I only have time to do one long cycle a yr and not enough time to do 2 short cycles with the post cycle.
Do whatever floats your boat

[AceDaBoss]

I would probably go shorter because I tend to be more cautious. Shorter= probably less side effects. But I can't speak personally on longer cycles. Which causes more side effects:

Higher doses/shorter cycles

Lower doses/longer cycles