Instant Access Registration Takes Less Than 15 Seconds! You May Not Post Until Registered.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble staying logged in when navigating between forums/topics/etc., you need to reset your session cookie. Go into your browser and delete any cookie for the site them log back in. This should fix the login issue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Doctor urges limited use of Boston Scientific's new device
Doctor urges limited use of Boston Scientific's new device
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Boston Scientific Corp's new leadless implantable heart defibrillator, hailed by some as a breakthrough, should be used on a limited basis until more data are collected, a prominent cardiologist wrote in an editorial of a top medical journal.
Disclaimer: Steroid use is illegal in a vast number of countries around the world. This is not without reason. Steroids should only be used when prescribed by your doctor and under close supervision. Steroid use is not to be taken lightly and we do not in any way endorse or approve of illegal drug use. The information is provided on the same basis as all the other information on this site, as informational/entertainment value.
Re: Doctor urges limited use of Boston Scientific's new device
That's because we doctors know medical devices pass FDA guidelines with much less rigorous scrutiny than oral, ingested drugs. In fact, devices that had been recalled in Europe, still passed American FDA standards ( ie: some urological devices).
In 1990 an order from Congress that directed the FDA to gather rigorous evidence before a manufacturer can sell medical devices considered to be in the most risky category, known as Class 3. ( which this would be classified as) but the FDA hasn't finished implementing the law! The FDA has allowed hundreds of new Class 3 devices to be sold based on a less rigorous showing -- called a 510(k), after a section of federal law --" that they are "substantially equivalent" to combinations of other products marketed before 1976. "This type of evidence is collected in a laboratory, not with a clinical trial in patients.
The Government Accountability Office , especially under the Obamacare guidelines, is asking the FDA to ask makers of high-risk medical devices that had been allowed under the easier process to submit evidence to the agency backing their products' safety and effectiveness. THis will pose problems for older devices, which may be grandfathered in anyway.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment