Uh Oh, Glucorell Fails Its Label Claim

[YellowJacket]

Not surprised in the least, I called this company shady and dishonest for a reason.... enjoy:

http://www.labelclaimstesting.com/page.php?pageID=1

Uh oh Ulter....

[NPursuit]

Yup all kinds of good drama going on @ bb.com right now.

[YellowJacket]

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=171001

[ex_banana-eater]

http://forum.avantlabs.com/index.php?act=ST&f=1&t=5871&

[YellowJacket]

Funny how Macro & Ulter claim threads at boards like Elite arent deleted when they present negative feedback on their products, and I just watched one go down, the bb.com thread talks about it.. haha... amazing what these clowns pull off. Fuckin scammers.

[Blackfoot]

Damn. Half of what the label claimed? That sucks.

[YellowJacket]

Yea, all you guys got 50% of what you paid for....

[IntensityX]

It would seem that Ulter just got butt fucked

BUSTED

Eat,Learn,Train,Grow
IntensityX

[jack hust]

not good at all

[macro]

the test was done at the behest, of 1fast (a competitor), sent in and handled by neogen (the manufacturer of his r-ala), done by a lab that uses a methodology that three larger and more reputable labs say is a farce. A methodology that IBC, the tester in this case, cannot and will not even confirm works.

considering that AF has assays to show that it meets label, assays done on EVERY run, and is having an additional assay done by san rafael to re-verify this- it is extremely innaccurate to say that GlucorellR does not meet label claim.


YJ,

you said this had nothing to do with you and then you go and post a new inflammatory post. Your bias and venom are clouding your judgement. Good to see that your consistent.

[IntensityX]

Originally posted by macro
the test was done at the behest, of 1fast (a competitor), sent in and handled by neogen (the manufacturer of his r-ala), done by a lab that uses a methodology that three larger and more reputable labs say is a farce. A methodology that IBC, the tester in this case, cannot and will not even confirm works.

considering that AF has assays to show that it meets label, assays done on EVERY run, and is having an additional assay done by san rafael to re-verify this- it is extremely innaccurate to say that GlucorellR does not meet label claim.


YJ,

you said this had nothing to do with you and then you go and post a new inflammatory post. Your bias and venom are clouding your judgement. Good to see that your consistent.

Your fishing for excuses,face it you got caught with your pants down so stop with the lets blame our competitor for our own stupidity game it gets old pretty damn fast

Eat,Learn,Train,Grow
IntensityX

[YellowJacket]

Originally posted by macro

YJ,

you said this had nothing to do with you and then you go and post a new inflammatory post. Your bias and venom are clouding your judgement. Good to see that your consistent.

Actually, I posted this before I said that at CEM dumbass. A simple time stamp comparison would have told you that.... no wonder your products are shady.

[macro]

shady??

http://www.anabolicfitness.net/srcs/30970.pdf

[YellowJacket]

Ah, a test done by you on your products, I dont think anyone would expect anything less than what the label claims

Lame cover up.

[macro]

you are a complete idiot or just completely blinded by hatred.. wtf? would you beleive that a lab test done by a competitor is more legitimate.

there are 3 much larger and more reputable labs that claim that the methodology used by IBC is flawed. IBC claims that they cannot and will not verify the results.

ulter has tests from 3 labs showing that product meets label.