Tweetwell i dont know what specifically you want us to interpret, that would be a few pages of writing.
ill assume your asking about the last paragraph.
exemestane does bind and occupy the androgen receptor, however it is very wek in that respect, meaning dont even bother mentioning it cause it aint significant. they showed this by giving people 25mg exem daily and it did not sig increase free test, if it was keeping test from binding, free test would be higher since it wouldnt be binding to the androgen receptor, and would therefore be free floating inactive test. THIS IS GOOD
shbg levels decreased starting at a dose of 2.5mg daily and this effect increased(meaning less and less shbg) as the exem dose was raised. THIS IS GOOD.
the increase in lh and fsh were a result of lowered estrogen. lower the estro level in the body, and the pitutiary thinks not enough test is in the body, so it increases lh and fsh so the gonads will make more test(lh and fsh is how it communicates to the gonads to tell them how much test to make) this is why we take anti e's post cycle, to keep estrogen from binding to the pituitary, tricking it into thinking theres no test, so it pumps the lh out raising our test levels. yes you can use an anti e such as clomid or nolva, which bind to the hpta, or an anti aromatose, which just plain stop the conversion of test to estro. THIS IS EXPECTED, ITS NORMAL. NOT REALLY GOOD OR BAD, IT JUST AN EFFECT.
the reason the increase in test and lh was not sig from exem dosing, was because i assume these were not post cycle bodybuilders lol, they were reg males with reg test levels, so your body can only make so much test on its own via lowering estrogen.
however, i have seen studies showing ldex at 1mg ed and also clomid both raised NATURAL test levels up to 50% over baseline. many variables on that so results will vary.
if you werent asking about the last paragraph, well i hate you. cause i spent alot of time posting this lol