Tweet

Originally Posted by tn94z

You can't use that kind of math in MMA man. Different styles match up differently with different fighters. Never happen again? Rampage has beat the hell out of Chuck twice. The first time he compeletly destroyed Chuck. I like Chuck don't get me wrong, but just because he has beat Silva doesn't mean that he can beat Rampage.

Judgin by your math lets see.....Houston Alexander beat Jarinde in reocrd time, Jardine beat Chuck....so that means that Alexander can beat Chuck???

You're right bro. That was the point behind my reply but it was taken the wrong way. You can never say one fighter beat a certain guy then turn around and say he's going to win because of that. The comment was said that forrest beat shogun etc.... Well that doesnt mean much cause you can also say rampage beat chuck. So whats the difference? They will go toe to toe one day then we will see who will win.

Tweet

Originally Posted by MAK2102

I dont know, I mean anyone that puts rampage on a pedestal (although I like the guy), needs to remember he beat chuck past his prime. Also, look what Wanderlei Silva did to Rampage TWICE in Pride. Since then Chuck has beaten Silva. What Im getting at is that anything can happen, and you cant bank on what a fighter does against one guy as a bar as to what hes going to do to another. Its obvious that Forrest doesnt have a glass jaw so its going to take more than a bomb to end the fight.

was he past his prime when he beat him the first time??