TweetIt's a great concept man. A couple of dudes I know have been coaching me on it and I must say the mass I put on came from dc


Sent from the bottom of a protein jug.

TweetI used it years ago, wasn't really fond of it and garnished a few over use injuries

Tweet

Originally Posted by 6p6

I used it years ago, wasn't really fond of it and garnished a few over use injuries

I can see where the boredom comes and some injuries due to the concept. It goes against the basic workout that we use most of the time. Preaches simple mild stimulation and over time the frequency of muscles worked out ends in more growth. The only thing I don't like is that I lost a lot of endurance in my eyes.


Sent from the bottom of a protein jug.

Tweet^ya lost a lot of things! Like I said it's a good concept and works for pushing through a plateau but I probably won't use it much anymore.

TweetWell if we compared to GVT, I did the revamped 2010 GVT. And I liked it, I suffered,

if we look at the load, 10 x 10, compared to doggcrap

I do the extreme stretching, a bit of warm up, I will use my biceps curls

first time I did 58 times x 80lbs, I was like WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! then 20 x 100lbs, then died at 8 x 100lbs

so let's see the math, 58 by 80 = 4640lbs, 20 by 100 = 2000, then 800 for a total of 7240lbs

with GVT, I will use 90lbs 10 x 10 for a total of : 9000lbs

I feel there more volume in GVT than DG.

what you guys think,