Tweet
One reflection of America
By Mark Alexander
Back in 1992, a seasoned New York Times political satirist said he was concerned
that if Bill Clinton got elected, humorists wouldn't have much to work with --
until, that is, Clinton was asked about drug use and replied, "I experimented
with marijuana [but] I didn't inhale."
Satirists are again expressing similar concerns about Barack Obama, who radiates
Clinton's penchant for smugness, but unlike Clinton, frequently seems somber if
not depressed.
Obama and Clinton have similar histories of shattered childhoods, of tragedy
piled on misfortune, but Barack had the forethought to pre-empt some questions
about his life by framing it in a couple of biographies. For example, the issue
of his drug abuse: in "Dreams From My Father," an early biographical sketch of
his broken family, he described himself as a "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd
been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. ... I got
high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind. ... We were always playing
on the white man's court."
More specifically, he wrote, "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow
when you could afford it. Not smack, though."
So, are we to gather that Obama, truly a victim of circumstances for which he
deserves our compassion, inhaled, but exercised enough self-restraint to refrain
from smack (heroin)?
I know plenty of folks of all colors and stripes that were subject to appalling
abuse as children, but who, by the grace of God, rose above those circumstances.
But Barack Obama is still mired in the chaos of his youth.
The tragedy of Obama's childhood and adolescence now characterized his foray
into adulthood. He would lead us to believe that his anomalous years concluded
with his graduation from Harvard and move to Chicago, where, with a little help
from his friends, his star has risen faster than any political neophyte in
history.
However, as was the case with Clinton, pathological narcissism is the engine
propelling Obama's success, including his willingness to associate with very
unsavory characters in order to ensure his advance. Obama's compulsion to
succeed may induce him to fake right while running left; but to underestimate
the influence of those who have mentored him, those who "brung him to the
dance," is imprudent, to put it mildly.
A few years ago when visiting Kenya, home of the birth father who abandoned him
at age two, Obama spoke of corruption and how it undermines the integrity of
government: "My own city of Chicago has been the home of some of the most
corrupt politics in American history. Corruption is a problem we all share."
Now, after having soaked in Chicago's political cesspool for almost two decades,
Obama has emerged looking like a rose, if not so much smelling like one. But,
like he says, you can put lipstick on a pig...
Given Obama's recent endeavor to distance himself from one of his political
benefactors, the current kingpin of Chicago corruption, Gov. Rod Blagojevich,
I'm certain that he and his ilk will provide plenty of fodder for critics and
satirists alike. Whether any of his adoring media toadies would dare to use such
material against The One is another issue altogether. Perhaps that chore will be
left to an earnest prosecutor.
As I wrote recently in "Team Obamavich" last week, surely Barack possesses
enough political savvy to have insulated his involvement in Blagojevich's racket
with cutouts, disposable emissaries who can take one for the team if necessary
-- possibly even someone as close to Obama as, say, Rahm Emanuel.
However, could not the president-elect express just a bit of outrage about the
explicit and startling corruption charges against his audacious old buddy,
Blago, who spent the last month panhandling for big favors in return for the
appointment of Obama's Senate successor?
On the subject of favors, in a September interview, talkinghead Katie Couric
tossed Obama one of many softballs: "What is your favorite movie of all time?"
His answer may provide some insight into his own psyche and current "Chicago
problem": "The Godfather," said Obama, adding that his favorite scene "has to
be, the opening where the caretaker comes in and, you know, Marlon Brando is
sitting there and he's saying 'you disrespected me.' You know, 'and now you want
a favor.' It sets the tone for the whole movie. I mean there's this combination
of old world gentility and ritual, with this savagery underneath. It's all about
family, so it's a great movie."
Ah yes, it's all about "family, and the savagery underneath."
Is it possible that the president-elect has been battered and fried in
corruption for so long that he doesn't have the moral authority or fortitude to
condemn Blagojevich? Or is it that Obama has enough residual virtue left to
sense that denouncing Blago would constitute an act of hypocrisy greater than
even he could stomach?
During his tenure in office, none of Clinton's corrupt past stuck -- not
Whitewater, not Travelgate, not Filegate, not what his staff called "Bimbo
Eruptions" like credible rape charges and the abuse of a young White House
intern. Slick Willie, indeed -- the Teflon pres -- as the producer of that
product notes, "it is best known for its slipperiness, which is useful where
non-stick features are important ... making cleanup a breeze."
However, given Barack Obama's ability rinse clean from a life of antisocial
behavior, his association with miscreants, his close affiliation with corrupt
politicos, etc., he has discovered something better than Teflon.
The fact is Obama's political rise is not the result of slick deception and
evasion. His ascent to power can be attributed to something much more subtle
and, potentially, sinister, with far more ominous implications for the liberty
embodied in that august old document, our Constitution.
Some 67 million Americans identify with Obama. They see some part of themselves
reflected in his brokenness, his dysfunctional childhood, his victimization, and
his search for salvation and his father, in the authority of the state.
The implications of this distorted and perverted mass identity are grave.
History is littered with examples of tragic eras when economic and political
upheaval led weaker men to anoint a savior from among their ranks. The tyranny
and suffering that inevitably followed cost them, and succeeding generations,
far more than their original misfortunes.
By Mark Alexander
Back in 1992, a seasoned New York Times political satirist said he was concerned
that if Bill Clinton got elected, humorists wouldn't have much to work with --
until, that is, Clinton was asked about drug use and replied, "I experimented
with marijuana [but] I didn't inhale."
Satirists are again expressing similar concerns about Barack Obama, who radiates
Clinton's penchant for smugness, but unlike Clinton, frequently seems somber if
not depressed.
Obama and Clinton have similar histories of shattered childhoods, of tragedy
piled on misfortune, but Barack had the forethought to pre-empt some questions
about his life by framing it in a couple of biographies. For example, the issue
of his drug abuse: in "Dreams From My Father," an early biographical sketch of
his broken family, he described himself as a "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd
been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. ... I got
high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind. ... We were always playing
on the white man's court."
More specifically, he wrote, "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow
when you could afford it. Not smack, though."
So, are we to gather that Obama, truly a victim of circumstances for which he
deserves our compassion, inhaled, but exercised enough self-restraint to refrain
from smack (heroin)?
I know plenty of folks of all colors and stripes that were subject to appalling
abuse as children, but who, by the grace of God, rose above those circumstances.
But Barack Obama is still mired in the chaos of his youth.
The tragedy of Obama's childhood and adolescence now characterized his foray
into adulthood. He would lead us to believe that his anomalous years concluded
with his graduation from Harvard and move to Chicago, where, with a little help
from his friends, his star has risen faster than any political neophyte in
history.
However, as was the case with Clinton, pathological narcissism is the engine
propelling Obama's success, including his willingness to associate with very
unsavory characters in order to ensure his advance. Obama's compulsion to
succeed may induce him to fake right while running left; but to underestimate
the influence of those who have mentored him, those who "brung him to the
dance," is imprudent, to put it mildly.
A few years ago when visiting Kenya, home of the birth father who abandoned him
at age two, Obama spoke of corruption and how it undermines the integrity of
government: "My own city of Chicago has been the home of some of the most
corrupt politics in American history. Corruption is a problem we all share."
Now, after having soaked in Chicago's political cesspool for almost two decades,
Obama has emerged looking like a rose, if not so much smelling like one. But,
like he says, you can put lipstick on a pig...
Given Obama's recent endeavor to distance himself from one of his political
benefactors, the current kingpin of Chicago corruption, Gov. Rod Blagojevich,
I'm certain that he and his ilk will provide plenty of fodder for critics and
satirists alike. Whether any of his adoring media toadies would dare to use such
material against The One is another issue altogether. Perhaps that chore will be
left to an earnest prosecutor.
As I wrote recently in "Team Obamavich" last week, surely Barack possesses
enough political savvy to have insulated his involvement in Blagojevich's racket
with cutouts, disposable emissaries who can take one for the team if necessary
-- possibly even someone as close to Obama as, say, Rahm Emanuel.
However, could not the president-elect express just a bit of outrage about the
explicit and startling corruption charges against his audacious old buddy,
Blago, who spent the last month panhandling for big favors in return for the
appointment of Obama's Senate successor?
On the subject of favors, in a September interview, talkinghead Katie Couric
tossed Obama one of many softballs: "What is your favorite movie of all time?"
His answer may provide some insight into his own psyche and current "Chicago
problem": "The Godfather," said Obama, adding that his favorite scene "has to
be, the opening where the caretaker comes in and, you know, Marlon Brando is
sitting there and he's saying 'you disrespected me.' You know, 'and now you want
a favor.' It sets the tone for the whole movie. I mean there's this combination
of old world gentility and ritual, with this savagery underneath. It's all about
family, so it's a great movie."
Ah yes, it's all about "family, and the savagery underneath."
Is it possible that the president-elect has been battered and fried in
corruption for so long that he doesn't have the moral authority or fortitude to
condemn Blagojevich? Or is it that Obama has enough residual virtue left to
sense that denouncing Blago would constitute an act of hypocrisy greater than
even he could stomach?
During his tenure in office, none of Clinton's corrupt past stuck -- not
Whitewater, not Travelgate, not Filegate, not what his staff called "Bimbo
Eruptions" like credible rape charges and the abuse of a young White House
intern. Slick Willie, indeed -- the Teflon pres -- as the producer of that
product notes, "it is best known for its slipperiness, which is useful where
non-stick features are important ... making cleanup a breeze."
However, given Barack Obama's ability rinse clean from a life of antisocial
behavior, his association with miscreants, his close affiliation with corrupt
politicos, etc., he has discovered something better than Teflon.
The fact is Obama's political rise is not the result of slick deception and
evasion. His ascent to power can be attributed to something much more subtle
and, potentially, sinister, with far more ominous implications for the liberty
embodied in that august old document, our Constitution.
Some 67 million Americans identify with Obama. They see some part of themselves
reflected in his brokenness, his dysfunctional childhood, his victimization, and
his search for salvation and his father, in the authority of the state.
The implications of this distorted and perverted mass identity are grave.
History is littered with examples of tragic eras when economic and political
upheaval led weaker men to anoint a savior from among their ranks. The tyranny
and suffering that inevitably followed cost them, and succeeding generations,
far more than their original misfortunes.
