Guilt By association?

[FUZO]

TweetGuilt By association?
"When we complain about Obama's associations, we do not allege that these associations make him a criminal. We are not bound by a standard of "truth beyond a reasonable doubt." Nor is all association innocent. Some is deeply troubling. We are right in scrutinizing the associations of those who would be President. And Barack Obama's associations are not reassuring." (Werner Cohn )

SO LET'S EXAMINE A FEW FACTS:

A racist preacher, a communist priest, a 60's terrorist, a Black Supremacist, a hate mongering church? Should we just rule these associations as objectable?

WOULD WE BE FOOLS TO BELIEVE THIS:

1. It's just Obama's "ex-pastor?

2. It was just a 20 year phase that Obama cultivated while listening with unbelieving ears? Could he have attended this church simply just to hear the music?

SHOULD WE BELIEVE THAT OBAMA'S CONNECTION TO UNDERGROUND AYERS MEANS NOTHING?

Mentally denying the fact that Ayers blew up buildings, attempted to murder people, aided murders, and has never shown any remorse. Or should we be questioning why Obama attracts terrorists, including Hamas, and America haters? Even if Obama doesn't seek them out, should we as Americans not question nor be allowed to understand why THEY seek him out?

IS FATHER PFLEGER SOMEONE WE SHOULD JUST IGNORE:

It is no secret Pfleger made contributions to Obama, and that Pfleger received thousands of dollars in state earmarks championed by Obama when he was a state lawmaker in Chicago. I guess we are to think nothing of this. Or this: In Pfleger's sermons -- one made at Trinity United Church of Christ and the other made at his church, St. Sabina -- the 59-year-old priest threatened to expose "white entitlement and supremacy wherever it raises its head" and said Clinton "wasn't the only one crying. There was a whole lot of white people crying,"

OBAMA WANTS US TO BELIEVE LOUIS FARAKHAN IS JUST: "A PEST," SHOULD WE?

He has vilified whites and singled out Jews to blame for crimes large and small, either committed by others as well or not at all. (A dominant role in the slave trade, for instance.) He has talked of Jewish conspiracies to set a media line for the whole nation. He has reviled Jews in a manner that brings ****** to mind. AND HE IS A MEMBER OF THE NATION OF ISLAM. Yet Obama has been quoted as saying: "a silly man pushing a silly cause that poses no real threat to the Jewish community."

IS THE HATE MONGERING CHURCH OF OBAMA TO BE IGNORED?

We all recall the hateful, evil speech of Jeremiah wright, don't we? His famous words "God D--m America! Enough said on this vile, satanic angry man. We heard enough of his hate America speeches and his condemnation of the white man.

SO LET'S USE A CONSERVATIVE TERM QUOTED BY THOMAS CARLYLE:

""Show me the man you honor, and I will know what kind of man you are, for it shows me what your ideal of manhood is and what kind of man you long to be. "

IN SUMMATION:


REVERAND WRIGHT MAY THINK "THE CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST," but Deborah believes in the old adage that says: "birds of a feather flock together."

[firstenrgy]

TweetCouldn't have said it better!

[Merc]

Tweetif we look at who he associates with then should we assume that mccain is going to be another bush???

[FUZO]

TweetAGAIN BUSH 3 THATS ALL THEY HAVE OR HIS AGE RIGHT

[FUZO]

TweetOBAMA RAISING TAXES
RAISING THE CAPITAL GAINS TAX 50% MORE DOESNT WANT DRILLING DOESNT WANT NUCLEAR ENERGY,CLEAN COAL ECT I CAN KEEP GOING WITH OBAMA.

[Merc]

TweetI just want them to name who their VPs are going to be and then I will decide

[firstenrgy]

TweetWhat decision is there? It's either McCain or the socialist heathen.

[daved150]

Tweetfuk 'em both...they all suck. it's really only a matter of WHO you'd prefer to be fuked by!! either way, they both lie, cheat and steal and any success either have in office, i believe, is just a matter of circumstance. it's gonna be how it's gonna be either way!

[firstenrgy]

Tweet

fuk 'em both...they all suck.

Don't be shy, say what you feel.