barack obama stuff

[straydoglogic]

Tweeti dont agree with alot of this but here you go daved and fuzzy wuzzy

Barack NObama's Negatives

*He has no significant economic, military, diplomatic or foreign policy experience.
*He has no significant executive or business experience.
*He has no proven leadership ability.
*He has claimed a hate mongering, racist, anti-American pastor as spiritual adviser for 20 years.
*He has been revealed to be arrogant, condescending and elitist toward middle and lower income Americans who are the very people whose cause he professes to champion.
*He claims to be a uniter even as he aggressively uses divisive, socialist economic class warfare tactics.
*He has associated with extremist radicals and shady characters for decades.
*He believes the solution to every problem is a government handout or program paid for by unAmerican soak the "rich" tax increases.
He believes taxes should be raised on the 25% of Americans who are already paying 86% of Federal income taxes to give a tax cut to the 75% of Americans who are only paying 14% of federal income taxes. This is socialist wealth redistribution.
He believes that income taxes should be raised on the top 25% of wage earners who are already paying 86% of federal personal income taxes to pay for 1) Handouts, health care and education for the poor, 2) tax cuts for the "overburdened" middle class, 3) carbon taxes to fix a global warming problem that does not exist, 4) handouts to the NEA, unions and trial lawyers for their political support, 5) more useless ethanol subsidies to farmers for their support, 6) giving citizenship and full food stamps, Medicare, health care and social security benefits to 15 million illegal aliens in exchange for their long term voting support, 7) fixing the Medicare/social security financial debacle, 8) dubious "clean" energy initiatives that have no hope of materially reducing the 21 million barrels of oil America consumes every day, and 9) balancing the Federal budget. All of this is financially impossible and would destroy the economy, but he promises it anyway.

*He believes going into Iraq was a "massive" strategic blunder but he thinks abandoning Iraq to control by America's worst enemies and thereby triggering a huge oil price spike that would devastate the global economy is a brilliant strategy.
*He claims he can save America $125 billion per year by leaving Iraq even though leaving Iraq will cause America's annual oil costs to rise by many multiples of $125 billion.
*He believes massive tax increases, higher social spending, a massive and costly new health care entitlement and abandoning Iraq to chaos will spark economic growth when every credible economic theory indicates each of these measures would damage the economy.
*He believes it is a good idea to create a massive and costly new health care entitlement just as millions of baby boomers are retiring and placing ever increasing financial strains of Medicare and social security.

*He offers no credible economic growth agenda, but he does offer destructive, socialist tax and spend and isolationist programs to individual voter groups for their support with no regard for the very negative effects on the economy.
*He claims the 2003 Bush tax cuts should end in 2010 because they were an unfair tax break for the "rich" even though the bottom 75% of wage earners saw their share of Federal taxes drop from 16% to 14% between 2000 and 2005 while the top 25% saw their's increase from 84% to 86%.
*He claims the 2003 Bush tax cuts are the cause of high federal deficits even though federal income tax receipts increased by 51% from 2003 to 2006 while the federal deficit fell from $378 billion in 2003 to $168 billion in 2007.
*He blames the Republicans for the mortgage crisis even though there was no mortgage crisis in January 2007 when the Democrats took control of Congress.
He blames Republicans for the economic slowdown even though the USA economy was booming (5% annualized GDP growth rate in 3Q2007) until 8 months after the Democrats took control of Congress and began demanding higher taxes, higher government spending & an idiotic retreat from Iraq that sparked a $55 per barrel increase in the price of oil that is costing Americans over $350 billion more per year.
*He blames Iraq costs for the economic slowdown even though Iraq is costing 75% of Americans less than $5 per person per month and Iraq costs have had a much smaller negative economic effect than Obama's policies on Iraq and taxes and federal spending.
*He believes it is a bad idea to continue to spend the $5 per person per month that 75% of Americans are investing in Iraq to deter huge further oil price increases that would wreck the economy and their financial well being while ideally positioning Al Qaeda and Iran to threaten the USA more aggressively.
*He supports energy independence based on unproven "clean" energy technologies that have limited potential, but he opposes huge incentives for new nuclear and clean coal power plants construction that represent the only realistic means to cost effectively reduce oil consumption.
*He rages against the economic and social injustices of America even as he personally benefits from living the American dream.
*He has abstained or avoided votes on tough issues throughout his political career to maintain his political viability.
*He has twice voted not to fund America's troops in Iraq to serve his political money masters at MoveOn.org.

*He talks the talk of uniting America even though he is an extremist liberal who has never walked the walk of achieving bipartisan consensus on anything.
*He relentlessly panders to workers on NAFTA in public even as he demeans their viewpoint in private.
*He believes tyrants and terrorists are worthy negotiation partners that would not threaten American interests if the USA abandons the Middle East.
*He believes it is okay to leave Iraq to control by Al Qaeda and Iran where they would be ideally positioned to intimidate, undermine, threaten and possibly achieve their goals of ousting the "apostate" Saudi regime who happens to control the only excess oil supply on earth.
Just to further his personal political ambitions, he would recklessly risk America's national security and the financial well being of all Americans by abandoning Iraq to chaos as a political pay off to his big time money donors at MoveOn.org.

[FUZO]

TweetSEE AND PEOPLE WANT HIM

[daved150]

Tweetman...thats alot of shyt!!! i may just go 3rd party. bad part is i havnt really heard anything about anyone else!

[angryoldman]

TweetPlain and simple:
If you like Obama, you vote "No" to hand guns. If you vote no to hand guns, you are un-American. It's in our Constitution to bear arms. Why would someone feel that they can change and re-write our Consitution. That's what terrorists do. They want to change everything American, and everything this Country was based and founded on.

[FUZO]

Tweethe is the biggest liberal in congress no fuking experience what the hell man. it will bite you dems in the ass if he's elected you see.


AOM EXACTLY

[firstenrgy]

Tweet

Plain and simple:
If you like Obama, you vote "No" to hand guns. If you vote no to hand guns, you are un-American. It's in our Constitution to bear arms. Why would someone feel that they can change and re-write our Consitution. That's what terrorists do. They want to change everything American, and everything this Country was based and founded on.

Very true. If the liberals had their way, the 2nd amendment would be history.
They seem to be in good company... ******, Stalin, Mao... They all had strict gun control. Mass murders agree, gun control works

[Klash]

TweetPhuckin Eh, firstengy and AOM!

man...thats alot of shyt!!! i may just go 3rd party. bad part is i havnt really heard anything about anyone else!

If you value liberty Bob Barr will do fine.

Side note: I read the other day that Ron Paul does not support the "write in" campaign simply because most states will not report those votes and that is a crucial part of the equation.

[firstenrgy]

Tweet[QUOTE=Klash;849970]Phuckin Eh, firstengy and AOM! QUOTE]

May I suggest anger management?

[straydoglogic]

Tweet

Phuckin Eh, firstengy and AOM!




If you value liberty Bob Barr will do fine.

Side note: I read the other day that Ron Paul does not support the "write in" campaign simply because most states will not report those votes and that is a crucial part of the equation.

wow bro..i think this is the first time you and i will disagree...but maybe you'll change your mind when im done...lol..Bob Barr is not who we want..he's close to what we're looking for but not our man...if you have to vote third party then Chuck Baldwin is who we want...a good friend of Ron Pauls who helped out with his campaign..i can put money on the fact that if the good Dr. endorses anybody it will be Chuck Baldwin...