Did the U.S. government plan and carry out the attacks of September 11th?

[HeHateMe]

TweetSince we have some conspiracy theorists amongst us, I just wanted to sample the general population of Fitnessgeared. I believe it's completely absured.

Simple question.

Yes or No?

[HeHateMe]

Tweetsee ^^^ that's why I want the edit feature enabled. I spelled 'absurd' wrong. LoL

[daved150]

Tweet

see ^^^ that's why I want the edit feature enabled. I spelled 'absurd' wrong. LoL

we all know what you wanted to say so dont worry about editing...shyt, if spelling counts, i'm screwed!!! lol


to answer your questions, i absolutly DO NOT believe so.

[solidground]

Tweetno they didnt plan it.. were certain officials in the govt aware of it, yes, anyone who believes in 9-11 truth that i know doesnt think it was our govt as a whole, certain people within our govt were definately involved and had foreknowledge.. i think the word govt may be too general for this question..Im not one who thinks GWB had anything to do with planning it, i think thats as rediculous as a man in a cave being responsible.

[FUZO]

TweetNO WAY

[superdog]

TweetI think that I can`t answer this poll because "US GOVT" means executive, representative and judical branches so of course "NO".

Perhaps a better poll idea if you want to try would be the following questions:

Do you believe that the buildings were brought down only by fires started from regular (carbon based) jet fuel?

Do you believe that building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition?

Do you believe that the NTSB is telling the US public the truth?

Do you believe that a Boeing 757 hit the pentagon?

One of those questions might get more to the heart of the question that I think your trying to ask.

[superdog]

TweetBecause one thing I know for sure. I know we don`t have the whole truth.

Structural steel melts at 1500 deg C. The hottest a carbon based fire can get (in a lab) just approaches 1000. There is plenty of evidence and eyewitness accounts of melted steel at WTC 1 & 2.

Now you can say what you want but chemistry is chemistry- can`t break those rules. Paper, jet fuel, wood, plastic mixed perfectly with plenty of oxygen can not melt structural steel - it`s why they make it that way, in case of fire even a big one, it won`t fail. Structural steel is a standardized product used in almost all large buildings including WTC 1, 2 & 7.

[HeHateMe]

Tweet

I think that I can`t answer this poll because "US GOVT" means executive, representative and judical branches so of course "NO".

Perhaps a better poll idea if you want to try would be the following questions:

Do you believe that the buildings were brought down only by fires started from regular (carbon based) jet fuel?

Do you believe that building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition?

Do you believe that the NTSB is telling the US public the truth?

Do you believe that a Boeing 757 hit the pentagon?

One of those questions might get more to the heart of the question that I think your trying to ask.

LoL I wasn't going to get into the finite, technical details.

Let me re-phrase it to: 'Do you believe a conspiracy has taken place in which many members of the U.S. hierarchy were involved in some capacity?'

Is that better?

[diggi]

TweetYES .. YES .. and YES

[kite]

TweetNo, I don't believe that anyone in our gov't planned and carried out the attacks. I do however believe that there was complete incompitance and failure at many levels. I'm no structural engineer, and really don't give a flyin fukk what burns at what temp so I haven't got a clue as to wether or not the jets took out the buildings or if there was something else involved. Until someone comes out with some kinda proof I'm not buying anything.

[a-bomb83]

Tweeti will say, "loose change" was a very interesting movie/documentary. if you've never seen it, i highly recommend renting/downloading it.

[pigmeat]

Tweetno

[superdog]

Tweet

No, I don't believe that anyone in our gov't planned and carried out the attacks. I do however believe that there was complete incompitance and failure at many levels. I'm no structural engineer, and really don't give a flyin fukk what burns at what temp so I haven't got a clue as to wether or not the jets took out the buildings or if there was something else involved. Until someone comes out with some kinda proof I'm not buying anything.

The molten metal issue is pretty well documented. I`ll e-mail you stuff if you want. They actually had to stop digging for a couple of days because the rubble was too hot for the diggers. Some of the most famous evidence is a NASA satelite imaging photo a day or two after the buildings went down that show a temp of over 1000 degrees. So for me the basic chemistry issue is a really strong arguement. I`m not interested in conspiries or politics, I want the truth.


I have no idea who did it but I`m very sure that planes alone didn`t do it.

[Klash]

TweetI don't believe the "government" had anything to do with 9/11. I admit that diggi and solidground have persuaded me, somewhat, that some things don't add up but to go from questioning how building 7 fell and why the steel beams look blasted instead of bent - to the government did it, is quite a stretch.

[kite]

Tweet

I have no idea who did it but I`m very sure that planes alone didn`t do it.

Actually the more I read and what not, the more I tend to agree.