doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11

[jackson vile]

Tweethttps://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

UPI Hears...


By John Daly
UPI International Correspondent

Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI) -- Insider notes from United Press International for June 8

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

[O2BESOHUGE]

TweetTHATS BULLSHIT....IT THATS TRUE THEN THEY KNEW OF THE HIJACKED PLANES AND SCHEDULED IT AT THE SAME TIME THE PLANES HIT THE TOWERS

O2

[daved150]

Tweet....here we go again....

[geesler]

Tweet

THATS BULLSHIT....IT THATS TRUE THEN THEY KNEW OF THE HIJACKED PLANES AND SCHEDULED IT AT THE SAME TIME THE PLANES HIT THE TOWERS

O2

Thats what happened

[geesler]

Tweet (geesler runs for cover)

[HungarianBeast]

TweetI call BS!!!!!

The real website for The Washington Times is:

https://www.washtimes.com/

[solidground]

Tweeti dont know about the twin towers but building #7 was pulled, its a fact..the owner of the building has admited to it-not bullshit

[T-Man007]

TweetIt's bullshit! Controlled demolition always, and I do mean always blows from the ground floor, not the upper floors. This has already been disproven by several Structural Engineers. They clearly point out the fact that there is no way to do a controlled demo from anywhere but the ground floor. Since it is obvious that the colapse came from the floors above the impact point of the planes falling down, there is nothing else to argue. If you've ever seen a coltrolled demo the floors colapse at the bottom first and then everything comes down form there.

Furthermore, when steel heats it gets weak. You take a plane and put it inside a steel frame building with insulation and burning jeat fuel and you create an insulated fire with ample oxygen. Result= one hell of a hot fire, way more than needed to challenge the stress factors of steel, way more. The upper floors fell straight down and the last part to go was the gournd floors.

[T-Man007]

Tweet

I call BS!!!!!

The real website for The Washington Times is:

https://www.washtimes.com/

Bwahahahah! And the TRUTH will set you free. Copy cat website! Now I know it's beyond bullshit, it just a phukin lie!

Thanks HB, I totally missed that.

[jackson vile]

Tweet

It's bullshit! Controlled demolition always, and I do mean always blows from the ground floor, not the upper floors. This has already been disproven by several Structural Engineers. They clearly point out the fact that there is no way to do a controlled demo from anywhere but the ground floor. Since it is obvious that the colapse came from the floors above the impact point of the planes falling down, there is nothing else to argue. If you've ever seen a coltrolled demo the floors colapse at the bottom first and then everything comes down form there.

Furthermore, when steel heats it gets weak. You take a plane and put it inside a steel frame building with insulation and burning jeat fuel and you create an insulated fire with ample oxygen. Result= one hell of a hot fire, way more than needed to challenge the stress factors of steel, way more. The upper floors fell straight down and the last part to go was the gournd floors.

I know that they put explosives not in just the lower floor but all the way up on the support, this is in order to get the building to fall in on it's self. Other wise if you just blew the bottom it would fall out and not in.

As for this info, we will find out in 25 years just like with the cocain BS with the CIA (and nobody cares about that), and Pearl Harbor (no one cares about that either), as I have stated before no matter what this is the gov's fault end of story!

But when you or I mess up we get jailed or sued to a pulp.

[HungarianBeast]

TweetPerhaps you guys missed it (except t-man)... that link is to a bogus website.

[T-Man007]

Tweet

I know that they put explosives not in just the lower floor but all the way up on the support, this is in order to get the building to fall in on it's self. Other wise if you just blew the bottom it would fall out and not in.

Actually, they only put charges on the lower floor, it's the order they blow the charges that causes the building to fall in on itself. Here's why, the strongest supports on any building are the external ones, not the internal ones. Its the perimeter that has the most strength, for obvious reasons. By blowing the center of the lowest floor first you cause the external structures to cave in, it's basic physics. That's how a building of that magnitude is taken down. But, don't take my word for it, go do a search and read it for yourself, that's what I did. Every source I gathered my info from were actual Structural Engineers and they ALL say the same thing. No charges except for the lower levels. Period.

[Symbolic]

TweetWhy do folks have to believe that a conspiracy theory is behind every disaster. There is no way, and I mean no way, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives by the government. How do I know? Because a good friend of mine works for Controlled Demolitions here in Maryland (they are the largest demolition company in the world). The building would have had obvious explosives and beams cut that everyone would have seen prior to 9/11. I know the article is bogus from a bogus website. But now, you have people like the person who started this thread start to believe this crap is true....Simply amazes me...

[daved150]

Tweet

Why do folks have to believe that a conspiracy theory is behind every disaster. There is no way, and I mean no way, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives by the government. How do I know? Because a good friend of mine works for Controlled Demolitions here in Maryland (they are the largest demolition company in the world). The building would have had obvious explosives and beams cut that everyone would have seen prior to 9/11.

THANK YOU!!! MAN, THE CONSPIRACY CRAP GET'S OLD.....

[T-Man007]

Tweet

Why do folks have to believe that a conspiracy theory is behind every disaster. There is no way, and I mean no way, that the twin towers were rigged with explosives by the government. How do I know? Because a good friend of mine works for Controlled Demolitions here in Maryland (they are the largest demolition company in the world). The building would have had obvious explosives and beams cut that everyone would have seen prior to 9/11. I know the article is bogus from a bogus website. But now, you have people like the person who started this thread start to believe this crap is true....Simply amazes me...

Symbolic, you the man. Great fact based points that can't be argued! Your friend in Controlled Demo vs some unsupported theory, hmmm....I'll take your guy. After all, he does it for a living so I think he'd know just a little more than any of us.