Body weight/amount of juice??

[Joe Mamas Mama]

TweetHow much effect do you think your body weight has on the amount of Juice someone should take??

[solidground]

Tweetive heard arguements saying it has alot to do with weight and heard arguements saying it doesnt..i would think that it has more to do with individual factors..some people just respond well to AAS and dont need high doses

[mick-G]

TweetDepends on your cycle history if that is what your using it for. If for HRT it doesn't matter.

[makavellie23]

Tweeti believe its not a factor. seeing personally some of the cycles some of us are on is way more than what we are supposed to be taking, but hey we take it not bcause of low test levels but to get big. thats the nature of the game. you wanna get big you need more than recommended (IN MOST CASES) but there is such a thing as too much, you have to find what works for you. i dont believe any of us calculate our bodywieghts in our cycles am i right or wrong fellas

[Got Gear?]

TweetI think it pays a big roll.

300mg/wk in a 300lb man would have the same effect as 200mg/wk in a 200lb man.

[badasz32]

Tweeti just go by what i ran previously, and how clean my receptors are.

[JsJs24]

TweetI believe it definately has an effect on it. Especially for a first cycle.

[T-Man007]

Tweet

I think it pays a big roll.

300mg/wk in a 300lb man would have the same effect as 200mg/wk in a 200lb man.

I don't know about that (no offense intended). For instance, 300mg in Ronnie Coleman vs 300mg in some guy who is 40% body fat would probably have different results. I think it depends on your cycle history, lean body mass and how well the AAS will bind to your receptors.

[Got Gear?]

Tweet

I don't know about that (no offense intended). For instance, 300mg in Ronnie Coleman vs 300mg in some guy who is 40% body fat would probably have different results. I think it depends on your cycle history, lean body mass and how well the AAS will bind to your receptors.

Cycle history does play a roll....for the individual.

But even then... say Ronnie was 2 feet shorter and weighed 100lbs less. 300lb ronnie will grow less on the same amount of gear as 200lb Ronnie would assuming that they have the same cycle history and genetics.

[weihunglow]

TweetIm 300lbs at 14% BF now and i know for a fact i dont get the same
results with 1 gram of test a week like i did around 265 lbs, so now
im thinking of maybe 1.25 gram or 1.5 grams of week just to feel
and see more results, just my 2 cents.

[T-Man007]

Tweet

Cycle history does play a roll....for the individual.

But even then... say Ronnie was 2 feet shorter and weighed 100lbs less. 300lb ronnie will grow less on the same amount of gear as 200lb Ronnie would assuming that they have the same cycle history and genetics.

Right on! Now, I'm following you.

[T-Man007]

Tweet

Im 300lbs at 14% BF now and i know for a fact i dont get the same
results with 1 gram of test a week like i did around 265 lbs, so now
im thinking of maybe 1.25 gram or 1.5 grams of week just to feel
and see more results, just my 2 cents.

No you just need more creatine. LOL

Damn bro, 300? How tall are you? I see what you mean. Do you change types? Like one long cycle of Enanthate, then the next cycle use sustanon, then the next use cyp. Maybe the slightly different make ups will bind to the receptors differently and you wont have to go up. 1 gram is a lot. But then, you're a big boy so who knows.

[skeer126]

Tweet300 pounds huh.....id love to know how tall u r and if u got a pic that would be awesome...

[edvedr]

Tweet

I believe it definately has an effect on it. Especially for a first cycle.

lol and i was gonna say i think it plays a role...BUT not so much with your first cycle.

[badasz32]

Tweeti know a bro who is 265 and he always does 1 cycle per year, and always grows of 400mg of test, he will stack it with one other compounds like eq, deca, or d-bol. He never raises his test over 400mg a week. He gets bigger everytime but he has enough time off in between cycles to clear his receptors.