AME Church denies withdrawing support for Obama

[FUZO]

TweetThe African Methodist Episcopal Church is condemning a false online report that the denomination withdrew support for President Barack Obama over his support for same-sex marriage.




More...

[JsJs24]

TweetNo way in heck would I ever believe they are withdrawing support for Obama. I'd say 90% or more of the black population votes for Obama. I'm sure there is a statistic somewhere for that.

[Dzone]

TweetI am assuming Obama will get re-elected. I hope I am wrong. Afraid Romney is being viewed as Corporate greed.

[JsJs24]

Tweet

I am assuming Obama will get re-elected. I hope I am wrong. Afraid Romney is being viewed as Corporate greed.

It's hard to say due to so many people that were let down by Obama and his false promises. However, a lot of people view Romney as a very weak Republican, especially 3rd part voters who tend to vote conservative. I think the biggest sign that he is a weak candidate is the fact that the Republican Party is running a campaign focused on beating Obama, instead of "electing Romney." Whenever the goal is to beat the other candidate it reveals the fact that the candidate running against the incumbent is not very popular or well received. This has been the case for the last two elections. John McCain was a terribly weak candidate who had no chance of ever beating Obama. There were many reasons for this but the two that stand out most to me were the fact that he had very poor speaking skills and it was another beat the other candidate campaign, or prevent the other candidate from winning. The latter is a sure sign of a weak candidate who has no real shot of winning. I find it particularly disturbing that in a country with more than 300 million citizens the best the Republicans have to offer is Romney and McCain. Yet I expect this because I personally believe the elections are predetermined, meaning the parties already know who they are going to place on the ballot; and in some cases if not all, they already know who is going to win the election. I can tell you from experience as a delegate this year that the election process is full of fraud, so much so that I will not partake in one again. When you witness district chairpersons carry the ballot box to an undisclosed location with 2 or 3 Romney supporters and count them in private you get the feeling that the whole thing is rigged. That is what I saw for numerous districts in my city. Initially Romney won the popular vote in my state (NV) until later during the delegate vote when Ron Paul swept the vote capturing all of the remaining delegate seats. However, since Romney had won 51% or more (51 in his case if I recall correctly) he was entitled to half of the delegates. Upon learning how the delegate process works I realized it is why there are so many close call races in the primaries and caucuses in which the candidate the party is behind barely wins 51% or more of the vote. I'm sure there are more people who believe the elections are fair and that the best man or woman wins than there are those who believe it is fixed or partially fraudulent at the least. To those I suggest getting involved in the delegate process and attending the elections. It may not be so obvious when those running are all accepted by the party, but when someone such as Ron Paul is in the race the fraud becomes blatantly obvious. But even though Newt and the others are accepted by the party it was also obvious in their cases that they were not who the party wanted on the ballot. Romney was the man chosen by the party as far back as 2009. It was his turn. There was or is no stopping it. Now we get to sit back and see who pulls off the win, Romney or Obama. Obviously I would rather see Romney win than Obama but to be honest I don't expect much to change if Romney pulls it off. The bailouts will continue, the Federal Reserve will print more money made out of thin air, more wars will be waged, unemployment will increase, the healthcare bill will stay, and the Constitution will be ignored.