Your Faith (or lack of) and Political Party!!!!

[Klash]

TweetWhat is your faith (religion - if christian what denomination) or lack of (agnostic, atheist)?


Politically how are you registered (or how do you vote)?




Klash:
Religion (lack of): Atheist
Registered: Independent - vote Libertarian!



next!

[Phreak]

Tweetnish- spiritual, but skeptical...


no political affiliation, but i lean more towards libertarian than anything else

[BIGMOFO]

TweetBaptist!
best guy for the job!

[Skarhead]

Tweetno religion
moderate

[Stout1]

TweetAtheist.

I am not any party persay, it just happens to be that the DEMS on most issues are in agreeance with what I beleive it. I don't fully support nor believe in some things, but overall I would give them my support of those cock sucking, money stealing, conservatives

[daved150]

TweetRELIGION-RAISED CATHOLIC...BUT, HAVING ISSUES
POLITICALLY...WHO EVER I FEEL LIKE

[Klash]

Tweet

Atheist.

I am not any party persay, it just happens to be that the DEMS on most issues are in agreeance with what I beleive it. I don't fully support nor believe in some things, but overall I would give them my support of those cock sucking, money stealing, conservatives

You know dems are more open towards homosexuality, so cock sucking might apply to dems more than conservatives. money stealing could go either way but I get what your saying: anti-conservative!

[URNDIT]

TweetReligion: Non-denominational
Politics: As soon as there's someone worth voting for, I'll vote.

[snickers1]

TweetChristian.. and attend church every sunday
democrat ..i suppose

[Stout1]

Tweet

You know dems are more open towards homosexuality, so cock sucking might apply to dems more than conservatives. money stealing could go either way but I get what your saying: anti-conservative!

I'm not ant-conservative....I like to think of myself as pro-american public

[solidground]

Tweetfaith:agnostic
politics: lost faith...but agree with libertarian the most

so cock sucking might apply to dems more than conservatives..haha i dont know, look at the elite sex trade..theyre all pretty conservative

[supasaiyan99]

TweetChristian-attend a Pentacostal church but I consider myself non-denominational.
Politics-I'm a registered democrat but I'll vote for who ever I see fit for the job.

[T-Man007]

TweetChristian
Republican by conviction.

I can not and will not vote for someone who supports gay marriage or abortion. That's why I say by conviction. I don't like everything Bush does, but I have to stand judgement for my choices and I will not vote for someone because of gas prices. I vote for who I believe has the same beliefs as me. That's hard, because I do like the Dem's take on the environment better than the Repub's. But then again, the environment, in my opinion, is less of a moral issue than abortion and support of gay marriage. Just for the record, I have no issue with gay people whatsoever. I try to do my best to treat people as people and not judge, but when the choices of people conflict with my belief I will disagree with their choices. I for one am in no position to judge another person, but when the choices of one party weaken the moral fiber of humanity then I will go with the other party. I personally belive that gay marriage spits in the face of God (and nature) and that abortion teaches irresponsibility. In my belief life is a gift from God, no matter how it comes to be. And that child has done absolutly nothing to deserve destruction. As far as gay union it just makes no sense. Even if one has no religion the very fact that two same sex humans can not produce a natural offspring would tell you that it's not a natural union. Survival of a species depends on that species ability to do three things: obtain food, obtain shelter and reproduce. Since same sex humans can not reproduce, it's not a 'natural' union. Now, some will argue about opposite sex marriages who suffer from the inability to have children. That's not the same thing. A man or woman who lacks the ability to have a child is totally different than two men or two women. What do you think would happen to lions if they all turned gay? They would cease to exist.

[solidground]

Tweett-man what about the straight couples that choose not to have kids? they are not adding to our population either. theres enough straight men and women to promise our survival..what your saying makes sense logically but humans have emotions that cant be defined by logic - such as love.. if two men, or two women love eachother imo they should be able to be married just not in a church. i see what your saying though.

[Stout1]

Tweet

Christian
Republican by conviction.

I can not and will not vote for someone who supports gay marriage or abortion. That's why I say by conviction. I don't like everything Bush does, but I have to stand judgement for my choices and I will not vote for someone because of gas prices. I vote for who I believe has the same beliefs as me. That's hard, because I do like the Dem's take on the environment better than the Repub's. But then again, the environment, in my opinion, is less of a moral issue than abortion and support of gay marriage. Just for the record, I have no issue with gay people whatsoever. I try to do my best to treat people as people and not judge, but when the choices of people conflict with my belief I will disagree with their choices. I for one am in no position to judge another person, but when the choices of one party weaken the moral fiber of humanity then I will go with the other party. I personally belive that gay marriage spits in the face of God (and nature) and that abortion teaches irresponsibility. In my belief life is a gift from God, no matter how it comes to be. And that child has done absolutly nothing to deserve destruction. As far as gay union it just makes no sense. Even if one has no religion the very fact that two same sex humans can not produce a natural offspring would tell you that it's not a natural union. Survival of a species depends on that species ability to do three things: obtain food, obtain shelter and reproduce. Since same sex humans can not reproduce, it's not a 'natural' union. Now, some will argue about opposite sex marriages who suffer from the inability to have children. That's not the same thing. A man or woman who lacks the ability to have a child is totally different than two men or two women. What do you think would happen to lions if they all turned gay? They would cease to exist.

A few random things...

Not everyone believes in your god so how can you hold them accountable for your beliefs?

So what if they are gay, just like you said they are not bothering you. What's the difference. If they want to be gay, let them. Doesn't affect me any, nor does it you.