Denistenil

[angryoldman]

TweetThis is an injectible steroid and is a close derivative of Dihydrotestosterone. it is high in androgens, but will not aromatize. It is not toxic to the liver either. It is primarily used for cutting, and hardening up lean muslces. It will not cause water retention, and the high androgens seem to help glycogen storage, thus keeping the muscles full and ripped. Dosages were in the range of 100mgs every 3 to 4 days. This drug is to androgenic for women. it is currently very hard to find on the market.

[SMILEY FACE]

Tweetwho makes it??????

[DJDIGGLER]

Tweethmmmm......How do they know it won't effect the liver?

[Phreak]

Tweet

hmmmm......How do they know it won't effect the liver?

because the only AAS that are liver toxic are ones that have to make the "first pass" through the liver when taken orally. oral steroids will be destroyed by the liver on this pass if an alteration to a certain molecule is not made. this alteration makes the AAS survive the pass, but puts extra stress on the liver. enough stress over time raises liver values and is what causes the terminology "toxic" to be used. if taken long enough and in high enough doses cysts can form in the liver which can be fatal if they burst. this however is very rare and is only seen in extreme cases of long term use and high dosages. liver cancer has also been reported with oxymetholone, but never in the case of healthy individuals.

injectible drugs do not make this first pass, as they make their way into the blood stream via the muscle they were injected to.

denistenil is injectible.

$1000 says they don't tell your wife this stuff in med school.

"STEROIDS BAD!!! YOU TAKE STEROIDS YOU DIE!!! LIVER WILL FALL OUT AND TESTICLES DISAPPEAR!!!! STEROIDS BAD!!!!

...now go prescribe some valium, hydrocodone, and cialis to that 80 year old man in the lobby. hurry now, we get incentives for doing so."

[DJDIGGLER]

Tweet

because the only AAS that are liver toxic are ones that have to make the "first pass" through the liver when taken orally. oral steroids will be destroyed by the liver on this pass if an alteration to a certain molecule is not made. this alteration makes the AAS survive the pass, but puts extra stress on the liver. enough stress over time raises liver values and is what causes the terminology "toxic" to be used. if taken long enough and in high enough doses cysts can form in the liver which can be fatal if they burst. this however is very rare and is only seen in extreme cases of long term use and high dosages. liver cancer has also been reported with oxymetholone, but never in the case of healthy individuals.

injectible drugs do not make this first pass, as they make their way into the blood stream via the muscle they were injected to.

denistenil is injectible.

$1000 says they don't tell your wife this stuff in med school.

"STEROIDS BAD!!! YOU TAKE STEROIDS YOU DIE!!! LIVER WILL FALL OUT AND TESTICLES DISAPPEAR!!!! STEROIDS BAD!!!!

...now go prescribe some valium, hydrocodone, and cialis to that 80 year old man in the lobby. hurry now, we get incentives for doing so."

She said she doesn't agree nor disagree. are there any non biased studies that prove there are no adverse reactions from taking certain injectible performance enhancing steroids?

[Phreak]

Tweetthere was one study done on long term high dose administration of testosterone in healthy adult males. the most serious side effects were gynocomastia and acne. it was published in the new england journal of medicine. it's referenced on the real sports program that a link was posted to on here a while back---

https://www.steroidlaw.com/images/steroids_0002.wmv

of course no one can say there will be no adverse reactions from taking any medications. it's the same with anything you ingest. all the case studies in the world cannot account for individual genetics.

they can:

speed up male pattern baldness in prone individuals
cause gyno
cause acne
water retention
aggression
weaken tendons
cause body hair growth
elevated liver enzymes
shrunken testes

...of course these are all dependent on the drug taken and the individual's propensity towards the adverse reactions. none of these are fatal and most are reversible.

and the US medical community has no reason to study most of the different drugs because a) most, if not all, aren't available in the US legally b) there uses are somewhat limited and c) the govt has managed to loop the in with rec drugs so the stigma scares them away. i mean it tells you something when the pharmacies lock these things up with the morphine. so, they rely on anecdotal evidence and scare tactics, which really does them a disservice in the long run because it keeps them ignorant.